Evidence-Based Medicine

Research Appraisals

Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.

Showing 3 appraisals

Systematic ReviewEvidence: Strong
85CEBM

Current cardiology reports

Bridging Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review on Transitional Care for Individuals with Congenital Heart Disease Using Data Mining Techniques to Identify Key Topics

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) face significant challenges when transitioning from pediatric to adult care. Despite growing recognition of its importance, transitional care remains inconsistently implemented across healthcare systems, and a summary of published literature in this regard is still missing. This scoping review aims to systematically map the literature on CHD transitional care and identify key topics and trends. METHODS: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across seven electronic databases using the Population, Concept, and Context framework. A total of 73 studies were included. Data were extracted and analyzed using Latent Dirichlet Allocation to identify core topics, and Multiple Correspondence Analysis was applied to explore thematic relationships and validate topic structure. Lexicometric analysis assessed the linguistic complexity and specificity of the literature. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged: (1) Education, Self-Management, and Structured Support, (2) Timing, Knowledge Transfer, and Developmental Needs, and (3) Transition Program Implementation and Coordination. These themes reflect an increasing focus on structured educational strategies, developmentally tailored care, and system-level program delivery. Education-focused interventions were more frequently found in recent, high-quality experimental studies. In contrast, studies addressing timing and developmental needs and those focused on implementation were more common in earlier-phase or heterogeneous research contexts. CONCLUSION: Transitional care for individuals with CHD requires more standardized, evidence-based approaches. Improved documentation when reporting transitional care is essential to enhance fidelity, scalability, and long-term impact. This review provides a foundation for developing outcome-focused research and supports designing individualized, high-quality transition programs.

23 May 2026

Read appraisal →
Systematic ReviewEvidence: Moderate
65CEBM

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer

Transitioning to adolescent and young adult or adult cancer survivorship care: A systematic review of contemporary guidelines and trials

BACKGROUND: Health service transitions of child, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors between paediatric and adult cancer care services are pervasively fragmented, resulting in poor coordination, reduced satisfaction, and adverse outcomes for cancer survivors and significant others (e.g., caregivers and family members). Numerous trials and clinical guidelines have been developed to support care transitions, but their convergence, divergence, and methodological quality remain unclear. To advance clinical practice and quality research about care transitions, a synthesis of trials and guidelines on child, adolescent, and young adult care transition across age-appropriate cancer services is required to inform future research, practice, guideline, and policy development. METHODS: A systematic review (CRD420251029796) was conducted. Studies were identified from searches of six bibliographic databases, four trial registers, and grey literature. Inclusion criteria focused on clinical guidelines or trials published between January 2020 and April 2025 that addressed age-related transitional cancer care. RESULTS: A total of 3706 records were identified. After screening, 18 records met the inclusion criteria: 10 clinical guidelines, 4 completed trials, and 4 ongoing trials with registrations. While general recommendations between guidelines were consistent, they diverged in detail relating to their local contexts. Only two ongoing trials, and no completed studies, included independent control groups. CONCLUSION: Completed trials were limited and highly variable in approach, components, and outcome measures, suggesting regionally specific guidelines enhance relevance, applicability, and transition practices. Future research should develop core outcome sets for care transition trials to facilitate comparison of outcomes and should develop robust study designs, including control groups.

9 Apr 2026

Read appraisal →
Randomised Controlled TrialEvidence: Moderate
60CEBM

Psychological medicine

The effect of managed transition on the proportion of young people transitioning from CAMHS to AMHS: Analysis of the Milestone Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Transition from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS) is poorly managed, with discontinuity of care commonplace, leading to poorer outcomes, while evidence-based interventions to improve transition are scarce. This study is a secondary analysis of the MILESTONE trial, aiming to determine whether managed transition increases the proportion of young people who appropriately transition from CAMHS to AMHS. METHODS: The MILESTONE trial was a multicenter, two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial across eight countries at 40 CAMHS sites to compare usual care (UC) to managed transition (MT). MT consisted of training, identification, and assessment of transition readiness and appropriateness. Eligible participants were receiving CAMHS care, IQ ⩾ 70 and within 1 year of their service transition boundary. CAMHS sites were randomized 2:1 between UC and MT. The main outcome was whether participants were receiving care from AMHS at 15 months follow up. RESULTS: The MILESTONE study included 793 participants, 552 receiving UC and 241 receiving MT. In the MT group, 24.9% transitioned to AMHS at 15 months compared to 14.2% in the UC group (p = 0.002), and appropriate transitions (in those with a need for transition at baseline or ongoing clinical need at 15 months) were 32.3% in the MT group compared to 16.4% in the UC group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of the MT group transitioned to AMHS at 15 months, and there was a higher proportion of appropriate transitions compared to UC. Clinicians and services should consider the incorporation of MT into routine clinical care.

7 Apr 2026

Read appraisal →