The effect of managed transition on the proportion of young people transitioning from CAMHS to AMHS: Analysis of the Milestone Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Young people aged 16-18 years receiving CAMHS care with IQ ≥70 and within 1 year of service transition boundary across 8 countries |
| I — Intervention | Managed transition (MT) consisting of training, identification, and assessment of transition readiness and appropriateness |
| C — Comparator | Usual care (UC) for CAMHS to AMHS transition |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: proportion receiving AMHS care at 15 months; Secondary: appropriate transitions based on clinical need |
Bottom Line
This large international cluster randomised trial demonstrates that managed transition significantly improves the proportion of young people successfully transitioning from child to adult mental health services. The intervention increased appropriate transitions from 16.4% to 32.3%, representing a clinically meaningful improvement in care continuity. While the study has methodological limitations including lack of blinding and limited outcome reporting, the results suggest that systematic approaches to transition planning should be incorporated into routine clinical practice. Australian mental health services could benefit from implementing similar managed transition protocols, though local adaptation and cost-effectiveness evaluation would be valuable. The intervention addresses a critical gap in mental health service delivery where poor transitions contribute to treatment discontinuity and worse outcomes for vulnerable young people.
Key Findings
P Value: p = 0.002 for primary outcome; p < 0.001 for appropriate transitions
Effect Size: 10.7 percentage point increase in transition rate
Primary Outcome: 24.9% in managed transition group vs 14.2% in usual care group transitioned to AMHS at 15 months
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Number needed to treat = 9.3 (1 additional appropriate transition for every 9-10 young people receiving managed transition)
Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract
Clinical Application
Requires training of CAMHS staff and systematic assessment protocols; may need additional resources for implementation Highly relevant to Australian mental health services given similar CAMHS-AMHS transition challenges; aligns with National Mental Health Strategy priorities for youth mental health continuity Young people aged 16-18 years with mental health conditions transitioning from child to adult services, particularly those with IQ ≥70
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transition from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS) is poorly managed, with discontinuity of care commonplace, leading to poorer outcomes, while evidence-based interventions to improve transition are scarce. This study is a secondary analysis of the MILESTONE trial, aiming to determine whether managed transition increases the proportion of young people who appropriately transition from CAMHS to AMHS. METHODS: The MILESTONE trial was a multicenter, two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial across eight countries at 40 CAMHS sites to compare usual care (UC) to managed transition (MT). MT consisted of training, identification, and assessment of transition readiness and appropriateness. Eligible participants were receiving CAMHS care, IQ ⩾ 70 and within 1 year of their service transition boundary. CAMHS sites were randomized 2:1 between UC and MT. The main outcome was whether participants were receiving care from AMHS at 15 months follow up. RESULTS: The MILESTONE study included 793 participants, 552 receiving UC and 241 receiving MT. In the MT group, 24.9% transitioned to AMHS at 15 months compared to 14.2% in the UC group (p = 0.002), and appropriate transitions (in those with a need for transition at baseline or ongoing clinical need at 15 months) were 32.3% in the MT group compared to 16.4% in the UC group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of the MT group transitioned to AMHS at 15 months, and there was a higher proportion of appropriate transitions compared to UC. Clinicians and services should consider the incorporation of MT into routine clinical care.
References
- 1.Rowland, T., Winsper, C., Morroni, D., Appleton, R., Tuomainen, H., Dieleman, G. C., Franić, T., de Girolamo, G., Madan, J., Maras, A., McNicholas, F., Paul, M., Purper-Ouakil, D., Santosh, P., Schulze, U. M., Street, C., Tremmery, S., Verhulst, F., Wolke, D., & Singh, S. P. (2026). The effect of managed transition on the proportion of young people transitioning from CAMHS to AMHS: Analysis of the Milestone Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291726103766
Related Research
Current opinion in pediatrics
Clinical implementation of artificial intelligence in adolescent mental healthcare
1 Aug 2026
Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM
Beyond A1c: a narrative review of mental health integration in pediatric type 1 diabetes care
25 July 2026
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Psychosocial interventions for families with minor children affected by parental cancer: An umbrella review
13 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service