Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 3 appraisals
The oncologist
Characterization and clinical management of adverse events following treatment with repotrectinib: a TRIDENT-1 analysis
BACKGROUND: Repotrectinib, a next-generation ROS1/TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer and NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Its side effects and safety management strategies require further characterization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The safety profile of repotrectinib (treatment-emergent/related adverse events [TEAEs/TRAEs]) was established in patients who initiated treatment at the recommended dose (160 mg daily [QD] for 14 days, then 160 mg twice daily [BID]) across all cohorts of the global, multicenter phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 study. AE management strategies were outlined. RESULTS: In 472 patients, the most common TRAEs (dizziness [58%] and dysgeusia [50%]) were likely TRK inhibition-related. Median relative dose intensity was 90%; 14% (n = 66/472) of patients did not increase their initial QD dose to BID (mostly due to CNS AEs). Rates of dizziness (median onset, 7 days) were similar in patients with/without baseline brain metastases. Dose modifications downgraded severity or resolved dizziness in 78% of patients; 58% of patients had pharmacologic intervention without dose modification. Dizziness was downgraded/resolved in 62% (n = 120/195) of patients who did not receive dose modification or pharmacologic intervention. Treatment-related cognitive impairment and weight gain occurred in 19% and 12% of patients, respectively. Treatment-emergent withdrawal pain occurred in 14% of patients (median resolution time, 2.1 weeks). Dose interruption and reduction from TRAEs occurred in 39% and 38% of patients, respectively; 10% reported later re-escalation back to 160 mg BID. CONCLUSION: Many repotrectinib AEs, including neurological AEs secondary to TRK inhibition, were mitigated with appropriate management, including dose modification and/or pharmacologic intervention.
12 May 2026
Read appraisal →Signal transduction and targeted therapy
Abexinostat, a histone deacetylases inhibitor, for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: a multi-center, single-arm phase 2 study
This phase 2, single-arm, multi-center study (NCT03934567) evaluates the efficacy and safety of abexinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL). Eligible participants had previously received a minimum of two systemic treatment lines, such as cytotoxic agents and/or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Participants received abexinostat 80 mg oral twice daily on a schedule of seven days on and seven days off, within 28-day cycles, continuing until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), evaluated by an independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints comprised duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Between May 2, 2019, and November 19, 2023, 90 patients were enrolled. As of October 08, 2024, with a median follow-up of 30.55 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.72-33.64), 17.8% (16/90) of patients were still on study treatment. The ORR was 69.5% (57/82, 95% CI 58.4-79.2), with a complete response rate of 14.6% (12/82). The DCR was 91.5% (75/82, 95% CI 83.2-96.5). Tumor size reduced in 89% (73/82) of patients. The median DoR was 13.96 months (95% CI 9.20-not reached [NR]) and the median PFS was 13.80 months (95% CI 9.69-30.26). The median OS was 47.18 months (95% CI 45.70-NR). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (77/90, 85.6%), neutropenia (53/90, 58.9%), and leukopenia (47/90, 52.2%). The results of this study demonstrated that abexinostat had promising efficacy and manageable safety profile, supporting abexinostat as a new treatment option for the third-line or later-line treatment of r/r FL.
2 May 2026
Read appraisal →Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
VIKTORIA-1 Trial of Gedatolisib Plus Fulvestrant With or Without Palbociclib in Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced Breast Cancer
PURPOSE: Gedatolisib potently targets all four class I PI3K isoforms and mTORC1 and mTORC2 to comprehensively block the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and has shown compelling activity in early clinical trials with palbociclib and fulvestrant. METHODS: This phase III randomized trial (VIKTORIA-1; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05501886) evaluated the efficacy of gedatolisib-based therapy, comparing gedatolisib, palbociclib, and fulvestrant (gedatolisib triplet) and gedatolisib plus fulvestrant (gedatolisib doublet) with fulvestrant monotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), PIK3CA wild-type (WT) advanced breast cancer. Eligible patients had disease progression during or after CDK4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor treatment. Comparison of progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review for gedatolisib triplet versus fulvestrant and gedatolisib doublet versus fulvestrant was the primary objective. RESULTS: A total of 392 patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1. The median study follow-up was 10.1 months. The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months in the gedatolisib-triplet group, 2.0 months in the fulvestrant group (hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.35]; P < .001), and 7.4 months in the gedatolisib-doublet group (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.48]; P < .001 v fulvestrant). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) reported in the gedatolisib-triplet and gedatolisib-doublet groups, respectively, included neutropenia (62.3%, 0.8%), stomatitis (19.2%, 12.3%), rash (4.6%, 5.4%), hyperglycemia (2.3%, 2.3%), and diarrhea (1.5%, 0.8%). Study treatment discontinuation because of TRAEs was reported in 2.3% (triplet) and 3.1% (doublet) of patients. CONCLUSION: The addition of gedatolisib to fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-, PIK3CA WT advanced breast cancer.
21 Apr 2026
Read appraisal →