VIKTORIA-1 Trial of Gedatolisib Plus Fulvestrant With or Without Palbociclib in Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced Breast Cancer
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA wild-type advanced breast cancer with disease progression during or after CDK4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor treatment |
| I — Intervention | Gedatolisib plus fulvestrant plus palbociclib (triplet) or gedatolisib plus fulvestrant (doublet) |
| C — Comparator | Fulvestrant monotherapy |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: progression-free survival by blinded independent central review; Secondary: treatment-related adverse events, treatment discontinuation rates |
Bottom Line
The VIKTORIA-1 trial demonstrates significant progression-free survival benefits for gedatolisib-based combinations in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA wild-type advanced breast cancer after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression. Both the triplet (with palbociclib) and doublet regimens showed substantial improvements over fulvestrant monotherapy, with hazard ratios of 0.24 and 0.33 respectively. However, the triplet regimen carried considerable toxicity, particularly grade 3+ neutropenia in 62% of patients. The open-label design and short follow-up limit the strength of evidence, and overall survival data are needed. While promising, these results require validation in longer-term studies before routine clinical adoption. The findings address an important unmet need in this patient population, but careful patient selection and toxicity monitoring would be essential if these agents receive regulatory approval.
Key Findings
P Value: Both comparisons P < 0.001
Effect Size: Triplet vs fulvestrant: median PFS 9.3 vs 2.0 months; Doublet vs fulvestrant: median PFS 7.4 vs 2.0 months
Primary Outcome: Progression-free survival by blinded independent central review
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Based on median PFS improvement, approximately 2-3 patients need treatment to prevent one progression event at 6 months
Confidence Interval: Triplet HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.17-0.35); Doublet HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.24-0.48)
Clinical Application
Requires access to gedatolisib (investigational agent), established infrastructure for PI3K/mTOR inhibitor monitoring, and expertise in managing associated toxicities including neutropenia and stomatitis Relevant to Australian practice where CDK4/6 inhibitors are PBS-subsidised first-line therapy. Would require TGA approval and PBS listing. Fits within Cancer Australia guidelines for advanced breast cancer management Patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who have progressed on CDK4/6 inhibitor plus aromatase inhibitor therapy, representing a common clinical scenario in Australian oncology practice
Abstract
PURPOSE: Gedatolisib potently targets all four class I PI3K isoforms and mTORC1 and mTORC2 to comprehensively block the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and has shown compelling activity in early clinical trials with palbociclib and fulvestrant. METHODS: This phase III randomized trial (VIKTORIA-1; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05501886) evaluated the efficacy of gedatolisib-based therapy, comparing gedatolisib, palbociclib, and fulvestrant (gedatolisib triplet) and gedatolisib plus fulvestrant (gedatolisib doublet) with fulvestrant monotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), PIK3CA wild-type (WT) advanced breast cancer. Eligible patients had disease progression during or after CDK4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor treatment. Comparison of progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review for gedatolisib triplet versus fulvestrant and gedatolisib doublet versus fulvestrant was the primary objective. RESULTS: A total of 392 patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1. The median study follow-up was 10.1 months. The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months in the gedatolisib-triplet group, 2.0 months in the fulvestrant group (hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.35]; P < .001), and 7.4 months in the gedatolisib-doublet group (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.48]; P < .001 v fulvestrant). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) reported in the gedatolisib-triplet and gedatolisib-doublet groups, respectively, included neutropenia (62.3%, 0.8%), stomatitis (19.2%, 12.3%), rash (4.6%, 5.4%), hyperglycemia (2.3%, 2.3%), and diarrhea (1.5%, 0.8%). Study treatment discontinuation because of TRAEs was reported in 2.3% (triplet) and 3.1% (doublet) of patients. CONCLUSION: The addition of gedatolisib to fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-, PIK3CA WT advanced breast cancer.
References
- 1.Hurvitz, S. A., Layman, R. M., Curigliano, G., André, F., Cristofanilli, M., Kim, S. B., Martínez Rodríguez, J. L., Nadal, J. C., Kim, G. M., Lo, L., Remolina-Bonilla, Y. A., Rosselli, G., Emile, G., Korbenfeld, E., Puig, J. M., Wesolowski, R., Martin, M., Ring, A., Han, H. S., Giordano, A., Mutka, S. C., Moss, K., Suzuki, S., Sullivan, B., Gorbatchevsky, I., & Pistilli, B. (2026). VIKTORIA-1 Trial of Gedatolisib Plus Fulvestrant With or Without Palbociclib in Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-02643
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service