Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 6 appraisals
The American journal of cardiology
Limus- Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Study-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Drug-coated balloons are the preferred treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR), avoiding the need for a second metallic layer. While both paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) and limus-coated balloons (LCB, typically sirolimus or biolimus) are used, direct comparative evidence is limited, particularly regarding their long-term angiographic efficacy and clinical safety. We conducted a systematic review and study-level meta-analyzis of studies comparing LCB with PCB for coronary ISR. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of science for randomized controlled trials. Outcomes were compared using risk ratios (RR) for categorical data and mean differences for continuous data in a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Six randomized controlled trials involving 1,038 patients were included (552 in the LCB group and 481 in the PCB group). Compared with PCB, LCB were associated with a significantly higher risk of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.14; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%) and target lesion failure (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.62; p = 0.27; I2 = 0%). In contrast, both platforms demonstrated no differences in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.98; p = 0.96), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.73; p = 0.46), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.66; p = 0.57), or MACE (RR: 1.09; p = 0.58). Angiographic outcomes were comparable, including late lumen loss (mean differences: -0.00 mm; p = 0.65; I2 = 74.7%) and minimal lumen diameter (mean differences: -0.12 mm; p = 0.07). In patients with ISR, PCB reduced repeat revascularization compared with LCB. These data suggest a modest advantage for PCB in preventing restenosis following drug-coated balloon angioplasty for ISR.
16 June 2026
Read appraisal →The New England journal of medicine
Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex High-Risk PCI
BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with increased stent optimization and reduced adverse events among patients with complex coronary-artery lesions, but adoption of this strategy in Western countries remains low. Although practice guidelines recommend intracoronary imaging for anatomically complex lesions, evidence from current European practice is limited. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, international, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients undergoing complex PCI to either IVUS-guided PCI, performed with the use of prespecified stent-optimization criteria, or angiography-guided PCI. The primary end point was target-vessel failure, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Of the 2020 patients who underwent randomization, 1010 in the IVUS-guided PCI group and 1009 in the angiography-guided PCI group were included in the primary analysis. The mean age of the patients was 69 years, 79.4% were men, and 27.4% presented with an acute coronary syndrome. The mean procedure duration was 88.8 minutes with IVUS-guided PCI and 66.2 minutes with angiography-guided PCI. Dilation with balloon angioplasty after stent implantation was performed in 91.3% of the IVUS-guided PCI procedures and in 84.5% of the angiography-guided PCI procedures. At a median follow-up of 19.0 months (interquartile range, 15.2 to 23.4), target-vessel failure had occurred in 140 patients (13.9%) in the IVUS-guided PCI group and in 112 patients (11.1%) in the angiography-guided PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.60; P = 0.08). Procedural complications occurred in 11.3% of the IVUS-guided PCI procedures and in 10.2% of the angiography-guided PCI procedures. The frequency of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing complex high-risk PCI, a strategy of routine IVUS-guided PCI performed with the use of prespecified stent-optimization criteria was not associated with a lower risk of target-vessel failure than angiography-guided PCI alone. (Funded by Boston Scientific; IVUS-CHIP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04854070.).
13 June 2026
Read appraisal →The New England journal of medicine
IVUS-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Disease
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Whether intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) guidance during PCI results in better clinical outcomes than conventional angiographic guidance alone is uncertain. METHODS: In an international, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either IVUS-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. The primary end point was a patient-oriented composite of any stroke, any myocardial infarction, any revascularization, or death from any cause at the longest follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 806 patients underwent randomization; 401 were assigned to undergo IVUS-guided PCI and 405 to undergo angiography-guided PCI. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 71.4±10.7 years, 78.4% of the patients were men, and 34.7% had diabetes. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, a primary end-point event had occurred in 135 patients (33.7%) in the IVUS-guided PCI group and in 125 patients (30.9%) in the angiography-guided PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.42; P = 0.40). The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization appeared to be similar in the two groups. The percentages of patients with procedure-related and overall safety events also appeared to be similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease, IVUS-guided PCI showed no additional benefit over angiography-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, any revascularization, or death from any cause at a median follow-up of 2.9 years. (Funded by Philips Image Guided Therapy Devices and Boston Scientific; OPTIMAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04111770.).
12 June 2026
Read appraisal →Circulation
Determining the Physiological Threshold for Angina (ORBITA-FIRE): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
BACKGROUND: In stable coronary artery disease, the primary goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is symptom relief. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and nonhyperemic pressure ratios such as resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) are used to guide revascularization. Although these indices correlate with myocardial ischemia, they have never been validated against the onset of angina. The physiological thresholds for angina, FFRangina and RFRangina, angina (FFRangina at rest and during exercise remain undefined. METHODS: ORBITA-FIRE (Finding the Invasive Threshold for Symptom Relief in Exertional Angina) was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with stable angina and single-vessel coronary artery disease. After imaging-guided PCI, an in-stent balloon was incrementally inflated until angina occurred at rest. This angina threshold was verified against placebo inflation, and corresponding FFRangina and RFRangina values were recorded at symptom onset. The protocol was repeated during low- and high-intensity exercise to assess changes in angina thresholds with increasing cardiac workload. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled (mean age, 63.9±8.7 years; 74% male; 69% hypertensive; 23% diabetic; 91% with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II-III angina). Median pre-PCI FFR was 0.59 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.46-0.70) and RFR was 0.61 (IQR, 0.40-0.82). Median FFRangina at rest was 0.29 (IQR, 0.23-0.35), increasing to 0.38 (IQR, 0.30-0.48) during low-intensity exercise and 0.45 (IQR, 0.36-0.55) during high-intensity exercise. RFRangina similarly increased from 0.22 (IQR, 0.16-0.30) at rest to 0.26 (IQR, 0.18-0.36) and 0.32 (IQR, 0.23-0.46) during low- and high-intensity exercise. All thresholds were significantly lower than clinical diagnostic cut points (P<0.001). Lower FFRangina and RFRangina thresholds were associated with greater symptom reproducibility across rest, low- and high-intensity exercise conditions (FFRangina: P=0.008, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively; RFRangina: P=0.015, P<0.001, P=0.002, respectively). Lower angina thresholds across all conditions predicted higher baseline angina burden and greater symptom relief with PCI (probability of interaction >0.999). CONCLUSIONS: Physiological thresholds for angina, FFRangina and RFRangina, are highly individualized, vary with cardiac workload, and are consistently lower than the universal ischemia-based thresholds used to guide revascularization. These findings support integrating personalized, symptom-linked physiology to refine patient selection and to improve symptomatic response to PCI.
9 June 2026
Read appraisal →EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve: 2-year follow-up of the FAVOR III Europe trial
BACKGROUND: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is an angiography-based method for estimating fractional flow reserve (FFR). The FAVOR III Europe trial showed that QFR guidance did not meet non-inferiority to FFR guidance, as measured by a composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularisation at 12 months. AIMS: We sought to report the 2-year outcomes of the QFR-guided diagnostic strategy and the FFR-guided strategy as applied in the FAVOR III Europe trial. METHODS: FAVOR III Europe was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. A total of 2,000 patients from 34 European medical centres were randomised to undergo QFR- or FFR-guided revascularisation of intermediate coronary artery stenoses. Endpoints assessed at the 2-year follow-up included the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and its individual components of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularisation. The rates of MACE were compared for superiority by unadjusted Cox regression analysis. The outcomes from 1 to 2 years were explored in a landmark analysis. RESULTS: At 2 years, the rates of MACE were 9.7% in the QFR group and 7.4% in the FFR group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.81; p=0.064). In the landmark analysis, the rates of MACE between 1 and 2 years were 3.2% in the QFR group and 3.2% in the FFR group (HR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.58-1.62; p=0.92). CONCLUSIONS: The excess risks associated with QFR-guided revascularisation compared with FFR were confined to the first year. From 1 to 2 years, the rates of MACE developed similarly in the QFR and the FFR groups.
10 May 2026
Read appraisal →Journal of the American Heart Association
Comparison of Intravascular Imaging-, Physiology-, or Angiography-Guided Approaches for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Despite current guidelines recommending physiology- and intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in specific lesion subsets, angiography-guided PCI remains common in practice. The comparative effectiveness of these strategies remains uncertain. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of PCI guided by intravascular imaging or physiological assessment versus conventional angiography. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, searching PubMed and EMBASE up to May 31, 2025. Eligible studies compared at least 2 of the following 6 guidance modalities in PCI: angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging, fractional flow reserve, angiography-derived fractional flow reserve, and instantaneous wave-free ratio. The primary outcome was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses assessed clinical presentation and guidance objectives such as decision making and procedural optimization. RESULTS: We identified 43 randomized controlled trials involving 39 291 patients. IVUS-guided PCI (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.79]), optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging-guided PCI (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63-0.90]), and fractional flow reserve-guided PCI (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70-0.95]) were associated with a lower risk of MACEs compared with angiography-guided PCI. Furthermore, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACEs compared with instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided PCI (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55-1.00]). IVUS-guided PCI reduced the risk of MACE in both acute coronary syndrome and non-acute coronary syndrome patients. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS- and optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging-guided PCI were superior to angiography-guided PCI in reducing MACEs. Among the physiology-based approaches, only fractional flow reserve showed a clear benefit.
9 Apr 2026
Read appraisal →