Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 3 appraisals
Blood advances
Pediatric-inspired regimens and HSCT for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
The best frontline treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is unclear. To support a clinical practice guideline, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed evidence on (1) asparaginase-based (pediatric) vs non-asparaginase-based (adult) regimens and (2) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vs no HSCT for AYAs (aged 15-39 years) with ALL in first complete remission. Data sources were PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception to 29 November 2023. Eligible studies compared regimens or the use of HSCT and reported survival, remission, toxicity, or quality of life in AYAs. We included 19 studies (14 comparative, 5 single-group; N = 3607) comparing regimens and 7 studies (N = 7492) comparing HSCT and no HSCT. Studies were mostly of poor quality, with sparse randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yielding low-certainty findings. Pediatric regimens were associated with higher 5-year overall survival (OS; relative risk [RR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.65), event-free survival (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13-2.85), disease-free survival (DFS; RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.82), and lower treatment-related mortality (TRM; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.90). HSCT was associated with lower 5-year OS (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.84) and DFS (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90) and higher nonrelapse mortality (RR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.18-6.18) and TRM (hazard ratio, 6.88; 95% CI, 3.02-15.70). Relapse risk varied by time point. In AYAs with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL, pediatric regimens may improve survival; toxicity-related evidence remains limited. HSCT may lead to inferior OS and DFS. With a dearth of RCTs, low-certainty evidence highlights the need for high-quality studies and subanalyses of AYAs.
26 May 2026
Read appraisal →Lancet (London, England)
Addition of autologous stem-cell transplantation to an ibrutinib-containing first-line treatment in patients aged 18-65 years with mantle cell lymphoma (TRIANGLE): 4·5-year follow-up of a three-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial of the European MCL Network
BACKGROUND: Adding ibrutinib to standard, first-line immunochemotherapy improves failure-free survival in adult patients aged 18-65 years with mantle cell lymphoma, according to the first results from the TRIANGLE trial. With prolonged follow-up, we investigated whether the addition of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to an ibrutinib-containing regimen improves failure-free survival, and evaluated effects on overall survival. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial (TRIANGLE) in 165 secondary or tertiary clinical centres, with experience in mantle cell lymphoma treatment and the capability to perform ASCT or an association with such a centre, in 13 European countries and Israel. Patients aged 18-65 years with untreated, stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma and suitable for ASCT were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to control group A or experimental groups A + I or I. Randomisation was done using computer-generated random numbers and stratified by study groups and Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index risk groups. Treatment in group A consisted of six alternating, 21-day cycles of R-CHOP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0 or 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 on day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 on day 1 [up to a maximum of 2 mg], and oral prednisone 100 mg on days 1-5) and R-DHAP or R-DHAOx (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous or oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, high-dose intravenous cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m2 for 3 h every 12 h on day 2, plus either intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2 over 24 h on day 1 [R-DHAP] or intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 [R-DHAOx]), followed by ASCT. In group A + I, oral ibrutinib (560 mg daily) was added on days 1-19 of R-CHOP cycles and as 2-year maintenance after ASCT. In group I, ibrutinib was given the same way, but ASCT was omitted. Rituximab maintenance was allowed in all treatment groups according to national guidelines. Three pairwise, one-sided, log-rank tests for the primary outcome (failure-free survival) were statistically monitored. The primary analysis was by intention to treat and included all randomly assigned patients, ignoring protocol deviations. Safety was assessed in randomly assigned patients who started any trial treatment component of the respective treatment phase. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02858258) and is complete. FINDINGS: Between July 29, 2016, and Dec 28, 2020, 870 patients (662 [76%] were male, 208 [24%] were female) were randomly assigned to group A (n=288), group A + I (n=292), or group I (n=290). After median follow-up of 54·9 months (95% CI 54·4-56·0), group A + I did not show superiority over group I, with 4-year failure-free survival of 82% (95% CI 78-87) versus 81% (76-86; hazard ratio [HR] 0·86 [one-sided 98·33% CI 0·00-1·27]; one-sided p=0·21). Group A + I remained superior to group A (82% [78-87] vs 70% [65-76]; HR 0·63 [one-sided 98·33% CI 0·00-0·89]; one-sided p=0·0026) and, as before, group A did not show superiority over group I (70% [65-76] vs 81% [76-86]; HR 1·45 [one-sided 98·33% CI 0·00-2·02]; one-sided p=0·99). 4-year overall survival was 88% (95% CI 84-92) in group A + I versus 81% (76-85) in group A (HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·38-0·92], p=0·0036) and 90% (87-94) in group I versus 81% (76-85) in group A (0·57 [0·36-0·90], p=0·0019). During maintenance or follow-up, the most common grade 3-5 adverse events were haematological disorders, reported in 127 (54%) of 234 patients in group A + I versus 74 (28%) of 269 in group I and 56 (23%) of 240 patients in group A, and infections, reported in 80 (34%) of 234 patients in group A + I versus 71 (26%) of 269 in group I and 37 (15%) of 240 patients in group A. Infections and infestations were the most common fatal adverse events during maintenance or follow-up, occurring in four (2%) of 234 patients in group A + I and five (2%) of 269 patients in group I. INTERPRETATION: After a prolonged follow-up of 55 months, both ibrutinib-containing groups showed relevant improvements not only in failure-free survival-a modified form of progression-free survival-but also in overall survival. In contrast, the addition of ASCT to an ibrutinib-containing regimen had no supplementary benefit but increased toxicity. Induction treatment with ibrutinib and R-CHOP plus R-DHAP (or R-DHAOx), followed by 2 years of maintenance treatment with ibrutinib, should be considered as a new standard of care for younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma. FUNDING: Janssen.
18 May 2026
Read appraisal →Blood advances
Treatment and survival outcomes for patients with follicular lymphoma and POD24: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Follicular lymphoma with progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) is associated with poor prognosis and represents clinical challenges. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of patients with POD24. Twenty-one trials involving 1242 participants were included, assessing the overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), duration of response, and progression-free survival. In some trials, we compared pooled response rates between POD24 and non-POD24 populations with the same treatment regimen. Four trials evaluated chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with POD24. Pooled analysis showed an ORR of 91.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.7-98.7) with significant heterogeneity (P = .0414; I2 = 68.61%) and a CR of 75.7% (95% CI, 55.1-96.4) with significant heterogeneity (P< .0001; I2 = 93.99%). The specific response rates for different bispecific antibodies in POD24 were pooled analysis, the ORR was 81.6% (95% CI, 75.9-87.3) with no heterogeneity (P = .6958; I2 = 0%), and the CR was 65.7% (95% CI, 57.1-74.3) with moderate heterogeneity (P = .2148; I2 = 34.99%). For anti-CD19 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)/monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), the ORR and CR rate for loncastuximab plus rituximab and tafasitamab plus R2 (lenalidomide + rituximab) were 100% and 79.3%, and 87.5% and 43.2%, respectively. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors and anti-CD20 mAb-containing regimens were also analyzed in pooled analyses. Our results demonstrated that anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy achieved the highest CR rate. Additionally, bispecific antibodies, anti-CD19 ADCs/mAbs, and the combination of lenalidomide with obinutuzumab or rituximab also exhibited excellent efficacy. Notably, lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab showed superior efficacy compared with R2.
15 Apr 2026
Read appraisal →