Pediatric-inspired regimens and HSCT for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adolescents and young adults (aged 15-39 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission |
| I — Intervention | Asparaginase-based (pediatric) regimens and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) |
| C — Comparator | Non-asparaginase-based (adult) regimens and no HSCT |
| O — Outcomes | Overall survival, event-free survival, disease-free survival, treatment-related mortality, nonrelapse mortality, relapse risk, toxicity, quality of life |
Bottom Line
This systematic review and meta-analysis provides low-certainty evidence that pediatric-inspired asparaginase-based regimens may improve survival outcomes in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared to traditional adult regimens. The analysis of 26 studies (N=11,099) suggests pediatric regimens are associated with 40% higher 5-year overall survival and 80% higher event-free survival, with reduced treatment-related mortality. Conversely, allogeneic HSCT in first remission appears associated with inferior survival outcomes. However, the predominantly poor quality of included studies, with sparse randomized controlled trials, limits confidence in these findings. The evidence is insufficient to definitively change practice, highlighting an urgent need for high-quality randomized trials specifically designed for the AYA population. Clinicians should consider these findings alongside individual patient factors and institutional expertise when making treatment decisions.
Key Findings
P Value: Not explicitly reported but confidence intervals exclude null
Effect Size: Pediatric regimens: RR 1.40 (1.18-1.65); HSCT: RR 0.72 (0.61-0.84)
Primary Outcome: 5-year overall survival
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Treatment-related mortality reduction with pediatric regimens: RR 0.29 (0.09-0.90)
Confidence Interval: 95% confidence intervals provided for all estimates
Clinical Application
Pediatric regimens may be feasible in AYA populations but require careful toxicity monitoring; HSCT decisions require individualized risk-benefit assessment Relevant to Australian haematology practice; aligns with current ALLG (Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group) protocols; PBS coverage considerations for asparaginase-based regimens Adolescents and young adults aged 15-39 years with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL in first complete remission
Abstract
The best frontline treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is unclear. To support a clinical practice guideline, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed evidence on (1) asparaginase-based (pediatric) vs non-asparaginase-based (adult) regimens and (2) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vs no HSCT for AYAs (aged 15-39 years) with ALL in first complete remission. Data sources were PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception to 29 November 2023. Eligible studies compared regimens or the use of HSCT and reported survival, remission, toxicity, or quality of life in AYAs. We included 19 studies (14 comparative, 5 single-group; N = 3607) comparing regimens and 7 studies (N = 7492) comparing HSCT and no HSCT. Studies were mostly of poor quality, with sparse randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yielding low-certainty findings. Pediatric regimens were associated with higher 5-year overall survival (OS; relative risk [RR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.65), event-free survival (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13-2.85), disease-free survival (DFS; RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.82), and lower treatment-related mortality (TRM; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.90). HSCT was associated with lower 5-year OS (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.84) and DFS (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90) and higher nonrelapse mortality (RR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.18-6.18) and TRM (hazard ratio, 6.88; 95% CI, 3.02-15.70). Relapse risk varied by time point. In AYAs with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL, pediatric regimens may improve survival; toxicity-related evidence remains limited. HSCT may lead to inferior OS and DFS. With a dearth of RCTs, low-certainty evidence highlights the need for high-quality studies and subanalyses of AYAs.
References
- 1.Sereda, Y., Mai, H. J., Kanaan, G., Melson, J. W., Terasawa, T., Cheung, M. C., Stock, W., Wolfson, J. A., Saldanha, I. J., & Balk, E. M. (2026). Pediatric-inspired regimens and HSCT for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Advances. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018736
Related Research
Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics
Artificial intelligence in immune checkpoint inhibitor research: A bibliometric analysis of the landscape
30 July 2026
Blood advances
Successful gene therapy for transfusion-dependent α-thalassemia: a case report
29 July 2026
Journal of chemical information and modeling
Functionally Guided Graph Learning for Robust Cross-Patient Cell-Type Annotation in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
29 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service