Research AppraisalSystematic Review

VR-Based Physical Activity and Self-Management Interventions for Glycemic Control and Behavioral Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of medical systemsLeng, Mengyuan, Tang, Shiying, Gan, Chenxin et al.13 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

60CEBM
Evidence: WeakSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationAdults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), n=1,005 across 10 studies
I — InterventionVR-based physical activity and self-management interventions including immersive or interactive VR programs for diabetes education and physical activity promotion
C — ComparatorTraditional approaches including routine care, in-person diabetes self-management programs, and content-equivalent 2D websites
O — OutcomesPrimary: glycemic control (HbA1c levels); Secondary: health-related behavioral outcomes

Bottom Line

This meta-analysis of 10 studies (n=1,005) found that VR-based interventions for diabetes self-management produced a statistically significant but clinically modest reduction in HbA1c (-0.50%, p=0.02) compared to baseline. However, VR interventions showed no superiority over traditional diabetes management approaches. While VR technology offers potential advantages in accessibility and patient engagement, the evidence is insufficient to recommend routine implementation in clinical practice. The included studies were methodologically heterogeneous, combining RCTs with weaker study designs. For Australian clinicians, VR interventions might serve as adjunctive tools for motivated patients with technology access, but should not replace established diabetes management protocols. More rigorous randomized trials are needed before VR interventions can be considered standard care for type 2 diabetes management.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: p = 0.02

  • Effect Size: Mean difference = -0.50%

  • Primary Outcome: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Clinically modest HbA1c reduction of 0.5% - below the 0.7-1.0% threshold typically considered clinically meaningful

  • Confidence Interval: 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.08

Clinical Application

Limited by VR technology costs, technical support requirements, and patient digital literacy May complement existing diabetes management under RACGP diabetes guidelines; PBS funding for VR interventions not established; would require integration with existing Diabetes Australia and state-based diabetes services Adults with T2DM who have access to VR technology and are comfortable with digital health interventions

Abstract

A growing body of original research has recently investigated virtual reality (VR)-based interventions for physical activity and self-management, yet yielded inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based physical activity and self-management interventions in improving glycemic control and modifying health-related behaviors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A total of 10 studies involving 1,005 adults with T2DM were included, comprising 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 non-randomized controlled trial (nRCT), and 4 self-controlled before-after studies. Of these, participants in the intervention groups received VR-based interventions, including immersive or interactive VR programs for diabetes self-management education or physical activity promotion, with most intervention durations ranging from 8 to 24 weeks. Control groups received traditional approaches, including routine care, in-person diabetes self-management programs, and content-equivalent 2D websites. The pre-post intervention analysis revealed that glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels decreased significantly post-intervention (mean difference (MD) = -0.50, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.08, p = 0.02). While VR-based physical activity and self-management interventions did not demonstrate superior efficacy to traditional intervention methods in glycemic control or behavioral outcomes, their unique advantages - including enhanced adherence, greater accessibility, and reduced spatiotemporal constraints - position them as a viable alternative for diabetes management. Nevertheless, the field requires more rigorously designed RCTs to establish efficacy and a systematic exploration of VR implementation protocols to maximize therapeutic benefits.

References

  1. 1.Leng, M., Tang, S., Gan, C., Xu, J., & Luo, D. (2026). VR-Based Physical Activity and Self-Management Interventions for Glycemic Control and Behavioral Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.033
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service