Research Appraisalobservational

A CT-based deep learning model to differentiate between benign and malignant adrenal lesions

European journal of radiologyHuang, Zack, Dohan, Anthony, Assié, Guillaume et al.1 Aug 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

50CEBM
Evidence: Weakobservational

PICO Framework

P — PopulationAdults with pathologically confirmed adrenal lesions (benign or malignant) undergoing CT imaging at a tertiary referral centre (Hôpital Cochin, Paris)
I — InterventionCT-based deep learning model incorporating manual segmentation of adrenal lesions combined with clinical, biological, and radiological features (tumour size, spontaneous attenuation, medical history, laboratory results)
C — ComparatorHistopathological diagnosis (surgical or biopsy-confirmed pathology) as the reference standard
O — OutcomesDiagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, AUC-ROC) for differentiating benign from malignant adrenal lesions; segmentation reproducibility (Dice similarity coefficient)

Bottom Line

This retrospective single-centre study from a French tertiary referral centre presents a CT-based deep learning model that achieves an AUC of 0.93 for differentiating benign from malignant adrenal lesions when clinical, biological, and radiological data are combined. The segmentation reproducibility is high (Dice coefficient 0.92). These are promising proof-of-concept results. However, several critical limitations temper enthusiasm for immediate clinical translation. The study cohort has a malignancy prevalence of 26.2% — far exceeding the 2–5% expected in general adrenal incidentaloma populations — introducing substantial spectrum bias that will inflate apparent performance metrics when applied to real-world settings. The absence of external validation, the non-reporting of sensitivity and specificity values, and the lack of comparison against existing validated diagnostic algorithms (such as unenhanced CT attenuation thresholds or adrenal washout CT) are significant gaps. For Australian clinicians, this model remains a research tool requiring prospective multicentre validation before it can supplement or replace current endocrine imaging pathways. Senior clinicians should await independent external validation and head-to-head comparison with established diagnostic approaches before considering adoption.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not reported in abstract

  • Effect Size: Accuracy 84.2%; AUC 0.93 in the test set (n=113 patients)

  • Primary Outcome: Diagnostic accuracy of the best-performing deep learning model (combining clinical, biological, and radiological data) for differentiating benign from malignant adrenal lesions on CT

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Sensitivity and specificity not reported in abstract; AUC 0.93 (95% CI: 0.899–0.979); segmentation reproducibility Dice coefficient 0.92 ± 0.03 (range 0.72–0.97)

  • Confidence Interval: Accuracy 95% CI: 79.9–88.6%; AUC 95% CI: 89.9–97.9%

Clinical Application

Manual segmentation is required, which demands trained radiological personnel and is time-intensive for routine clinical use. Integration into existing PACS/radiology workflows would require significant infrastructure investment. The multimodal input requirement (clinical history, laboratory results, CT data) necessitates coordinated multidisciplinary data access. In Australia, adrenal incidentalomas are commonly encountered in the context of CT performed for unrelated indications, with management guided by RACGP and Endocrine Society of Australia recommendations emphasising biochemical evaluation and size-based surveillance. FDG-PET/CT is available through Medicare for selected indications but not universally funded for adrenal characterisation. Adrenalectomy is performed at specialist centres. This model, if externally validated, could complement existing Australian pathways — particularly in centres managing high-risk patients (known extra-adrenal malignancy, biochemically active lesions). However, TGA approval and prospective Australian validation would be prerequisites for clinical deployment. The model is not currently PBS-listed or TGA-registered as a diagnostic device. Adults with adrenal lesions undergoing CT evaluation at tertiary endocrine or surgical centres, particularly where histopathological confirmation is planned. The model is not yet validated for use in the broader adrenal incidentaloma population managed in general radiology or primary/secondary care settings.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a deep learning model to differentiate benign from malignant adrenal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 380 patients with 385 pathologically confirmed adrenal lesions (101 malignant, 284 benign) were retrospectively included. Adrenal lesions were manually segmented on CT images and analyzed in a deep learning pipeline aimed at differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Four predictive models were developed that incorporated combinations of radiological data (tumor size, and spontaneous attenuation) and non-radiological data (i.e., medical history and laboratory results). Data of 267 patients were used as a training set and those of 113 patients for the test set. The diagnostic capabilities of the four models were estimated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) using histopathological findings as the gold standard. The reproducibility of manual segmentation was estimated using the Dice similarity coefficient after blinded resegmentation of 40 adrenal lesions by an independent radiologist. RESULTS: Segmentation reproducibility achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 ± 0.03 (range: 0.72-0.97). The most accurate model, which combined clinical, biological, and radiological data, achieved 84.2% accuracy (95% confidence interval: 79.9, 88.6) and an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 89.9, 97.9) in the test set for diagnosis of malignant adrenal lesion. CONCLUSION: A deep learning model integrating preoperative clinical, biological, and radiological features demonstrates high capabilities in differentiating benign from malignant adrenal lesions on initial CT examination.

References

  1. 1.Huang, Z., Dohan, A., Assié, G., Gaillard, M., Violon, F., Jouinot, A., Soyer, P., Bertherat, J., Marini, R., Chassagnon, G., & Barat, M. (2026). A CT-based deep learning model to differentiate between benign and malignant adrenal lesions. European Journal of Radiology, 112907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112907
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service