Technology-Based Prehabilitation for Patients With Cancer Before Elective Treatment: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: Not applicable - scoping review methodology

• Effect Size: Not applicable - scoping review protocol

• Primary Outcome: Not applicable - protocol stage

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable - will map intervention characteristics and feasibility outcomes

• Confidence Interval: Not applicable - protocol stage

Clinical Application

High potential - addresses real-world accessibility barriers through technology solutions Highly relevant to Australian cancer care given geographical challenges and telehealth infrastructure development post-COVID. May inform Cancer Australia guidelines and state-based cancer services. Cancer patients requiring elective treatment with geographical, socioeconomic, or time barriers to traditional prehabilitation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in cancer treatment have improved survival rates; however, patients continue to experience significant treatment-related side effects, leading to reduced quality of life. Prehabilitation is an intervention that occurs before treatment and can improve patients' functional capacity, recovery, and well-being through exercise, nutrition, and psychological support. Typical hospital-based prehabilitation is not accessible to all patients due to geographical, socioeconomic, and time-related barriers. Technology-based approaches, including eHealth and mobile health (mHealth) interventions, may overcome these barriers by enabling remote, patient-centered delivery. However, the current evidence base is heterogeneous and lacks synthesis regarding feasibility, acceptability, and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This protocol for a scoping review aims to outline how we will systematically map and synthesize the evidence on technology-based prehabilitation interventions for people with cancer to identify intervention designs, assess feasibility and accessibility, and highlight knowledge gaps to guide future research and practice. METHODS: The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A 3-step search strategy will be applied across multiple databases and gray literature sources. Eligible studies will include adults (aged ≥18 years) with a cancer diagnosis who are scheduled for elective treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or hormone therapy). Interventions must involve eHealth or mHealth approaches supporting unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation activities such as exercise, nutrition, psychological support, or lifestyle modification. Outcomes of interest include functional fitness, quality of life, psychological well-being, treatment preparedness, recovery, adherence, and feasibility. Two independent reviewers will conduct title, abstract, and full-text screening, with disagreements resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. Data will be charted and presented in tables and figures and as a narrative synthesis. Critical appraisal using JBI tools will contextualize methodological quality but not exclude studies. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials version 2 (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions version 2 (ROBINS-I V2) tool. This will not be used to exclude studies, but to determine the quality of articles included. RESULTS: The search strategy has been pilot tested and finalized. Database searches are scheduled to commence in March 2026, with study selection and screening anticipated to be completed by April 2026. Data analysis and synthesis are expected to begin in May 2026, and final results will be available by October 2026. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol outlines a rigorous and transparent approach to mapping the current evidence on technology-based prehabilitation in cancer care. By systematically characterizing intervention features, outcome domains, and evidence gaps, the review will provide an up-to-date evidence map to guide future research priorities, inform clinical implementation, and support the development of more standardized and inclusive prehabilitation pathways.

References

1. 1.Woods, G., Gaffney, C. J., Ryska, O., & Hayes, L. D. (2026). Technology-based prehabilitation for patients with cancer before elective treatment: Protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Research Protocols. https://doi.org/10.2196/86610