Social Media Intervention Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model Promotes HIV Testing and Reduces High-Risk Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Resource-Limited Settings in China: Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Men who have sex with men (MSM) in resource-limited settings in Nanning, China (n=180) |
| I — Intervention | 3-month social media intervention based on Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model with video-based tasks |
| C — Comparator | Routine HIV prevention services (standard care) |
| O — Outcomes | HIV testing uptake, high-risk sexual behaviors, consistent condom use, AIDS-related knowledge, safe sex self-efficacy |
Bottom Line
This Chinese RCT demonstrates that a 3-month social media intervention based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model significantly improved HIV testing rates and reduced high-risk sexual behaviors among MSM in resource-limited settings. The intervention showed substantial effect sizes (RR 1.7-2.5) across key HIV prevention outcomes with excellent follow-up rates. However, methodological limitations include unclear randomisation procedures, lack of blinding, and insufficient baseline data presentation. While promising for resource-constrained settings, direct applicability to Australian practice is limited due to different healthcare contexts and social media environments. The intervention model may inform digital health strategies for disadvantaged populations, but adaptation would be required for Australian MSM communities who have different healthcare access patterns and prevention needs.
Key Findings
P Value: All primary outcomes P<0.05
Effect Size: HIV testing RR 1.739, HIV self-testing RR 2.306, consistent condom use RR 2.457
Primary Outcome: HIV testing uptake significantly higher in intervention group
Nnt Or Sensitivity: NNT not calculable from provided data, but substantial relative risk improvements suggest low NNT
Confidence Interval: HIV testing 95% CI 1.110-2.730, HIV self-testing 95% CI 1.593-3.340, condom use 95% CI 1.636-3.690
Clinical Application
Requires social media platform access and video content development. Scalable intervention model Limited direct applicability due to different healthcare system, social media landscape, and cultural context. Australian MSM have better healthcare access through Medicare and PBS-subsidised PrEP MSM populations in resource-limited settings, potentially applicable to disadvantaged communities globally
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social media intervention may enhance HIV prevention among men who have sex with men, but the effect of this intervention in resource-limited settings remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether a social media intervention grounded in the information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model could be beneficial for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men in resource-limited settings. METHODS: Participants were recruited in Nanning, China, between April 2023 and April 2024. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to either the social media intervention group or the routine HIV prevention services control group. Participants in the intervention group received a 3-month social media intervention, which included completing video-based tasks. Baseline surveys were conducted, followed by follow-up surveys every 3 months, for a total of 2 follow-ups. Outcomes included HIV testing uptake, high-risk behavior, AIDS-related knowledge, safe sex self-efficacy, and attitude. RESULTS: A total of 180 eligible men who have sex with men were enrolled (90 per group). Follow-up rates were 97.8% (88/90) and 95.5% (86/90) for the intervention and control groups, respectively. At the follow-ups, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher uptake of HIV testing, a lower proportion of participants reporting high-risk sexual behaviors, and higher condom use self-efficacy compared to the control group (all P<.05). After controlling for sociodemographic variables, generalized estimating equations analysis revealed that the intervention group had significantly higher odds of HIV testing (risk ratio [RR] 1.739, 95% CI 1.110-2.730), HIV self-testing (RR 2.306, 95% CI 1.593-3.340), and consistent condom use (RR 2.457, 95% CI 1.636-3.690) than the control group. Cochran-Armitage trend tests within the intervention group revealed that with increasing intervention duration, both HIV testing and HIV self-testing significantly increased, while high-risk sexual behaviors significantly decreased (all P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The social media intervention guided by the IMB model demonstrated a positive effect on expanding HIV testing coverage, reducing high-risk behavior, enhancing AIDS-related knowledge, and improving safer sex self-efficacy among men who have sex with men in resource-limited settings. These findings provide valuable guidance for future HIV prevention and control efforts targeting this population.
References
- 1.Mai, H., Liu, J., Cheng, L., Liang, H., Cui, P., Yao, Q., Cao, Q., Zhang, H., Liao, W., He, S., Yang, X., Cen, P., & Huang, J. (2026). Social Media Intervention Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model Promotes HIV Testing and Reduces High-Risk Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Resource-Limited Settings in China: Randomized Controlled Trial. *Journal of Medical Internet Research*, *28*(4), e84279. https://doi.org/10.2196/84279
Related Research
JMIR human factors
Japanese Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale for Sexually Transmitted Infection-Related Chatbots: Development and Psychometric Validation Study
24 July 2026
The Journal of dermatological treatment
Intralesional human papillomavirus vaccination for cutaneous verrucae: a systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic efficacy
30 June 2026
The New Zealand medical journal
Cancer risk and screening in transgender and gender-diverse individuals on gender-affirming hormone therapy: a review article for the Australasian context
31 May 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service