Self-Monitoring Risk Factors for Diabetic Foot Ulceration With the Feetchecker App: Mixed Methods Study

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: Not applicable for qualitative study

• Effect Size: 393 foot checks completed by 24 patients over 3 months

• Primary Outcome: Positive user experience with Feetchecker app for diabetic foot self-monitoring

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: 7/24 patients (29%) sent pictures requiring podiatrist follow-up

• Confidence Interval: Not applicable for qualitative study

Clinical Application

Requires integration into existing podiatry workflows and patient digital health literacy support Relevant to Australian diabetes care pathways; could complement RACGP diabetes management guidelines and support rural/remote patient monitoring through telehealth initiatives Type 2 diabetes patients at risk of diabetic foot ulceration with adequate digital literacy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A prevalent and serious complication of diabetes mellitus is the development of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). There is a need for effective solutions that help prevent DFU to support our increasingly stressed health care systems. The use of mobile health (mHealth) tools has been shown to improve awareness and effective self-care management skills in people at risk of developing diabetic foot ulceration. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the perceived usefulness, engagement, and overall user experience of the Feetchecker app, a self-monitoring mHealth app for people at risk of DFU. METHODS: A total of 24 patients (mean age 71, SD 8.6 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus at risk of developing diabetic foot ulceration completed a 3-month evaluation period (70 recruited, 36 included, 12 dropped out) of a self-monitoring mobile app called Feetchecker app. A mixed methods approach was used to combine insights from app data with qualitative data from a pre- and postsurvey as well as interviews with patients and involved podiatrists. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. We evaluated overall use of the app, patient engagement, and user experiences. RESULTS: Patients who fully completed the study conducted 393 feetchecks. In total, 7 patients sent in 9 pictures; all 7 were called for follow-up by a podiatrist. Overall, patients had a positive experience with the app and perceived the Feetchecker app as a valuable tool to monitor their feet for potential risk factors of DFU. Ease of use in performing a feetcheck and sending the podiatrist a picture was described as an important feature. Three main types of engagement with the Feetchecker app emerged: continuous, frequent, and no to little engagement. These patterns highlight enablers for self-monitoring such as ease-of-use, easy access to a podiatrist, and social support, as well as barriers such as digital skills and sustained engagement. Podiatrists highlighted the benefits of having patients report potential issues quicker and the ability to monitor their patients remotely. Challenges remain in integrating the promotion of the Feetchecker app into their consultations. CONCLUSIONS: The Feetchecker app supported patients in self-monitoring risk factors associated with DFU through routine checks and quick contact with a health care professional in case of a potential issue. Overall, patients described a positive user experience and considered the app helpful. While mHealth tools are not for everyone, user engagement for many patients was high and shows that such apps can offer support for people able to use them. Future research should focus on improving usability and engagement with the app as well as extend the way patients can communicate with health care professionals beyond a picture.

References

1. 1.van den Heuvel, R., Arts, M., Pelders, D., & Brankaert, R. (2026). Self-monitoring risk factors for diabetic foot ulceration with the Feetchecker app: Mixed methods study. JMIR Formative Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/69408