Predictors of recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adult patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) |
| I — Intervention | Various prognostic factors (performance status, cancer type, previous VTE history, etc.) |
| C — Comparator | Absence of these prognostic factors |
| O — Outcomes | Recurrent VTE and anticoagulant-related bleeding events |
Bottom Line
This comprehensive meta-analysis of 96,753 cancer patients with VTE identifies key prognostic factors for treatment complications. Patients with pancreatic (3.2-fold increased risk), hepatobiliary (2.4-fold), or lung cancers (1.8-fold) face highest recurrent VTE risk, while those with breast cancer have lower risk. Poor performance status (ECOG >1) doubles both VTE recurrence and bleeding risk. Recent surgery is protective against VTE recurrence. For bleeding risk, previous bleeding history (2.4-fold increase), brain tumours (2.25-fold), and gastrointestinal cancers (1.7-fold) are key predictors. These high-certainty findings should inform individualised anticoagulation decisions, supporting more intensive monitoring for high-risk patients and potentially influencing choice of anticoagulant agent and duration of therapy in Australian cancer care settings.
Key Findings
P Value: Not explicitly reported in abstract
Effect Size: Highest risk factors: pancreatic cancer (aHR 3.20), hepatobiliary cancer (aHR 2.37), ECOG >1 (aHR 2.44) for VTE recurrence
Primary Outcome: Recurrent VTE and anticoagulant-related bleeding in cancer patients
Nnt Or Sensitivity: History of bleeding increases bleeding risk 2.4-fold (aHR 2.41, 95% CI 1.50-3.88)
Confidence Interval: 95% confidence intervals provided for all estimates, ranging from 1.08-4.96 across different factors
Clinical Application
Highly feasible - prognostic factors are readily available clinical variables (performance status, cancer type, surgical history) Directly applicable to Australian oncology and haematology practice; aligns with NHMRC cancer care guidelines and supports PBS anticoagulant prescribing decisions Adult cancer patients with established VTE requiring anticoagulation therapy
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a high risk of recurrent VTE and anticoagulant-related bleeding. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for these complications. METHODS: A systematic review was performed for randomized trials and cohort studies evaluating prognostic factors for recurrent VTE or anticoagulant-related bleeding in adult patients with cancer and VTE. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for factors were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies (n = 96 753) were included in the meta-analyses. Factors with high certainty of association with increased risk of recurrent VTE included a previous history of VTE [aHR 1.50 (95% CI 1.08-2.09)], Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >0 [1.81 (1.34-2.46)] or >1 [2.44 (1.55-3.84)], advanced cancer [1.38 (1.15-1.65)], and specific cancer sites including lung [1.78 (1.29-2.46)], hepatobiliary [2.37 (1.70-3.30)], pancreas [3.20 (2.06-4.96)], and genitourinary [1.38 (1.14-1.67)]. Conversely, recent surgery [aHR 0.56 (95% CI 0.40-0.76)] and breast cancer [0.43 (0.23-0.81)] had a high certainty of association with a decreased risk. Factors with a high certainty of association with an increased risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding included a history of bleeding [aHR 2.41 (95% CI 1.50-3.88)], ECOG performance status ≥2 [2.10 (1.48-2.99)], advanced cancer [1.60 (1.29-1.97)], and cancers of the brain [2.25 (1.64-3.09)], gastrointestinal system [1.74 (1.44-2.11)], genitourinary system [1.90 (1.48-2.45)], and prostate [1.72 (1.26-2.34)]. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic factors identified in this meta-analysis should be considered as part of risk stratification frameworks for anticoagulation management in patients with cancer and VTE.
References
- 1.Khan, F., Tritschler, T., Marx, C. E., Lanting, V., Rochwerg, B., Tran, A., Fernando, S. M., Lorenzetti, D. L., Wunsch, H., Holodinsky, J., Fiest, K., Stelfox, H. T., Delluc, A., Fergusson, D. A., Le Gal, G., Wells, P. S., Wang, T. F., Sanfilippo, K., van Es, N., Schrag, D., Connors, J. M., & Carrier, M. (2026). Predictors of recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2416112
Related Research
The American journal of pathology
An Integrated Machine Learning and Genomic Framework for Precise Detection of Gastric Cancer
3 Aug 2026
Current opinion in chemical biology
Prediction of protein-protein interactions and co-complex models with deep learning
3 Aug 2026
European journal of radiology
A CT-based deep learning model to differentiate between benign and malignant adrenal lesions
3 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service