Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Functional and ultrasonographic evaluation of high intensity laser therapy and Kinesio taping in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial

Lasers in medical scienceOglakci, Mehmet Furkan, Altindag, Ozlem, Akaltun, Mazlum Serdar et al.22 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

80CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — PopulationStroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain (n=33, 11 per group)
I — InterventionHigh-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) plus conventional therapy OR Kinesio Taping (KT) plus conventional therapy
C — ComparatorConventional therapy alone with sham HILT and sham KT
O — OutcomesPrimary: Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Secondary: VAS pain scores, passive shoulder ROM, ultrasonographic findings, Brunnstrom Recovery Stage, Functional Independence Measure, Health Assessment Questionnaire

Bottom Line

This small RCT suggests High-Intensity Laser Therapy may provide superior pain relief and functional improvement compared to Kinesio Taping or conventional therapy alone in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. While the double-blind design and comprehensive outcome measures strengthen the findings, the very small sample size (n=11 per group) and lack of confidence intervals limit confidence in the results. The study reports no adverse effects, making HILT a potentially safe adjunctive treatment. However, clinicians should interpret these results cautiously given the methodological limitations and consider the need for larger, more robust trials before widespread implementation. The interventions studied are readily available in Australian practice settings.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: p < 0.05 for between-group differences favoring HILT

  • Effect Size: Not quantified - only p-values reported

  • Primary Outcome: SPADI scores improved significantly in all groups post-treatment, with HILT showing superior improvement compared to control and KT groups

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported

Clinical Application

HILT requires specialized equipment but is non-invasive. KT is readily available and cost-effective Both interventions available through private practice and some public rehabilitation services. Not specifically covered under PBS but may be accessible through allied health programs Stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain in rehabilitation settings

Abstract

Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is a common post-stroke complication that limits functional recovery and rehabilitation participation. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical, functional, and ultrasonographic superiority of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) and Kinesio Taping (KT) over each other, as well as in comparison to conventional therapy (COT). The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated into three equal groups (n = 11 each group): Group 1 (Control Group) received COT with sham HILT and sham KT, Group 2 (HILT Group) received COT with active HILT and sham KT, and Group 3 (KT Group) received COT with sham HILT and active KT. COT was performed five days per week for three weeks, HILT was administered in 10 sessions, and KT was applied every other day for three weeks (nine sessions). The primary outcome measure of the study was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score. Secondary outcome measures included pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), passive shoulder range of motion (pROM), ultrasonographic findings, Brunnstrom Recovery Stage (BRS), the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). All measures were evaluated at baseline (pre-treatment) and immediately following the intervention period (post-treatment). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and McNemar tests. Groups were sociodemographically comparable (p > 0.05). Post-treatment, all groups exhibited significant improvements in shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation, and BRS, VAS, SPADI, FIM, and HAQ scores (p < 0.05). No significant changes occurred in ultrasonographic findings, shoulder abduction, or internal rotation. Notably, HILT demonstrated superior VAS and SPADI improvements compared to other groups (p < 0.05). HILT provides rapid, clinically significant pain relief and functional recovery in HSP without adverse effects, offering a safe and superior therapeutic option.

References

  1. 1.Oglakci, M. F., Altindag, O., Akaltun, M. S., & Gur, A. (2026). Functional and ultrasonographic evaluation of high intensity laser therapy and Kinesio taping in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers in Medical Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-16-4
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service