Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Progress and perspectives in soft robotics for surgery and rehabilitation

Journal of robotic surgeryLiu, Yang, He, Tianming, Yang, Zheng et al.19 June 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

5CEBM
Evidence: InsufficientSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients undergoing surgical procedures or rehabilitation (particularly those with neurological injuries requiring movement restoration)
I — InterventionSoft robotic systems including soft grippers, flexible endoscopes, and wearable soft rehabilitation devices with advanced actuation, sensing, and material technologies
C — ComparatorTraditional rigid robotic systems and conventional surgical/rehabilitation approaches
O — OutcomesSafety, dexterity, adaptability, precision of tissue manipulation, restoration of movement, closed-loop control capability, and clinical translatability

Bottom Line

This narrative review provides a broad overview of soft robotic technologies applied to surgery and rehabilitation, highlighting advances in actuation systems, smart materials, and multimodal sensing. However, it does not meet the methodological standards of a systematic review or meta-analysis. There is no systematic search strategy, no quality assessment of included studies, and no quantitative synthesis of clinical outcomes. The conclusions — that soft robotics offer superior safety, dexterity, and adaptability compared to rigid systems — are not supported by pooled clinical evidence. The review is best understood as an expert-authored technology landscape assessment rather than an evidence synthesis. Senior clinicians should treat its conclusions as hypothesis-generating rather than practice-changing. A notable bibliographic concern exists: the DOI provided corresponds to ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, not the Journal of Robotic Surgery, which warrants verification before citation. For Australian practice, no TGA-approved soft robotic surgical or rehabilitation devices are currently available for routine use. Clinicians interested in this field should seek out primary clinical trial data and monitor regulatory developments rather than relying on this review to guide patient care decisions.

Evidence: Insufficient

Key Findings

  • Effect Size: Not applicable — no quantitative effect sizes reported; all findings are descriptive and technology-focused

  • Primary Outcome: Qualitative synthesis of advances in soft robotic systems for surgical assistance (soft grippers, flexible endoscopes) and rehabilitation (wearable soft devices for neurological injury recovery)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not applicable — no clinical outcome data synthesised; no NNT, sensitivity, specificity, or hazard ratios calculable from this review

  • Confidence Interval: Not applicable — no statistical analyses performed

Clinical Application

Clinical implementation of soft robotic systems remains largely experimental. The review itself acknowledges that material durability, biosafety certification, and system stability represent unresolved barriers to clinical translation. No commercially available, regulatory-approved soft robotic systems are identified as ready for routine clinical deployment based on this review's evidence base. In Australia, surgical robotics falls under TGA regulation as Class IIb or Class III medical devices, requiring conformity assessment and clinical evidence of safety and performance. No soft robotic devices of the type described in this review currently hold TGA approval for routine clinical use. The RACGP and relevant specialist colleges (RACS, AAN) have not issued guidelines on soft robotic rehabilitation or surgical assistance. PBS listing of soft robotic rehabilitation devices is not currently applicable. Australian clinicians should monitor TGA's Digital Health and Medical Devices regulatory pathway and emerging NHMRC-funded research in this space. The review's findings are relevant to Australian research institutions and innovation hubs but do not yet translate to practice recommendations within the Australian healthcare system. Broadly, patients requiring minimally invasive surgery or neurological rehabilitation; however, the review does not define specific eligible patient populations with sufficient precision for direct clinical application. Most relevant to patients with stroke, spinal cord injury, or other neurological conditions requiring upper or lower limb rehabilitation, and to surgical teams considering next-generation flexible endoscopic or laparoscopic tools.

Abstract

Soft robotic systems have become a promising technology in the biomedical field due to their higher safety, dexterity and adaptability compared to traditional rigid robotic systems. This review focuses on recent advances in soft robotic systems applied to surgical assistance and rehabilitation. In surgery, soft grippers and flexible endoscopes show better adaptability, dexterity, and miniaturization, enabling safer and more precise manipulation of delicate tissues. In rehabilitation, wearable soft devices show great potential to help patients with neurological injuries to regain movement. Key innovations in actuation technology are examined, along with recent advances in multifunctional, self-healing, and environmentally responsive materials. Meanwhile, sensing systems are evolving from unimodal sensing to multimodal fusion, self-perception, and sense-drive integration, enabling robots to sense the body state and external environment with higher accuracy and realize closed-loop control. Finally, this paper points out that soft robots still face key challenges such as material durability, biosafety, and stability during clinical translation. In the future, the focus should be on the construction of systems with self-diagnosis, self-adaptive adjustment and closed-loop control, and promote the efficient landing and personalized application of soft robots from experimental research to real medical scenarios.

References

  1. 1.Liu, Y., He, T., Yang, Z., Wu, Y., Cui, H., Song, W., Li, X., Shi, X., Zhai, S., Gao, F., & Chu, S. (2026). Progress and perspectives in soft robotics for surgery and rehabilitation. Journal of Robotic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c04700
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service