Facility-Level Associations Between Use of a Digital Health Platform for Voluntary Counseling and Testing and HIV Testing Outcomes in the Urban Primary Health Care Centers of Guangzhou, China: Cross-Sectional Study
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 81 primary health care centers in 5 urban districts of Guangzhou, China, providing HIV voluntary counseling and testing services |
| I — Intervention | Use of WellTest digital health platform for HIV VCT appointment booking and counseling |
| C — Comparator | Varying levels of WellTest platform utilization across facilities (0-98% of clients using platform) |
| O — Outcomes | HIV testing volume and HIV positivity rate at facility level |
Bottom Line
This facility-level analysis of 81 primary health care centers in Guangzhou demonstrates that digital health platforms for HIV testing can achieve high uptake (median 71% of clients) and may improve case-finding efficiency. Facilities with greater platform utilization showed higher HIV positivity rates, suggesting digital platforms may reduce stigma barriers and attract higher-risk populations. However, active appointment confirmation reduced overall testing volumes while maintaining higher positivity rates, indicating a trade-off between quantity and yield. The cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and generalisability to Australian settings requires consideration of different healthcare structures and cultural contexts. These findings support the potential value of digital health platforms in HIV testing programs but highlight the need for careful implementation strategies.
Key Findings
P Value: P<0.001 for positivity rate; P=0.03 for testing volume
Effect Size: β=1.11 for HIV positivity rate with high platform use; IRR 0.75 for testing volume with active appointment confirmation
Primary Outcome: HIV positivity rate significantly higher in facilities with ≥50% WellTest use
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Overall HIV positivity rate 2.0% (157/7969 tests); median 71% of clients used WellTest platform
Confidence Interval: 95% CI 0.82-1.40 for positivity rate association; 95% CI 0.58-0.97 for volume association
Clinical Application
Requires digital infrastructure and staff training for platform implementation and appointment management Relevant for Australian sexual health services and GP practices implementing digital booking systems, though cultural and healthcare system differences limit direct application Primary health care settings implementing digital health platforms for HIV testing services
Abstract
BACKGROUND: WellTest, a digital health platform designed to facilitate HIV voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) services, has been widely implemented in Guangzhou, China. However, the extent of its use by primary health care centers (PHCs) and the facility-level associations between WellTest use and HIV testing outcomes remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the use of WellTest at the facility level across PHCs in urban Guangzhou, China, and to explore the associations between WellTest use and HIV testing outcomes. METHODS: We obtained data on VCT services visits from the National HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Information System and the WellTest platform between January 1 and December 31, 2022. Two facility-level HIV testing outcomes, the HIV testing volume and HIV positivity rate, were calculated for each PHC. A structured questionnaire collected data on the PHCs' characteristics. Multilevel negative binomial regression and zero-inflated gamma models were used to examine associations between WellTest use and 2 HIV testing outcomes at the facility level. RESULTS: A total of 81 PHCs across 5 urban districts in Guangzhou were included. WellTest was used for 7997 active consultations and 7969 HIV tests that resulted in 157 newly diagnosed HIV cases, for an overall positivity rate of 2.0%, during 2022. The median share of clients booking via WellTest was 71% (IQR 34%-98%), and 81% (66/81) of PHCs offered online slots on all service days without mandates. PHCs that actively confirmed appointments had significantly lower HIV testing volumes compared with those that took no actions after clients scheduled appointments (incidence rate ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; P=.03) but exhibited higher HIV positivity rates (β=.39, 95% CI 0.02-0.76; P=.04). Additionally, PHCs where ≥50% of clients used WellTest to schedule appointments showed higher HIV positivity rates than those with lower uptake (β=1.11; 95% CI 0.82-1.40; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: WellTest showed substantial use among VCT clients and providers in urban Guangzhou PHCs, with greater use of digital appointments and counselor follow-up linked to increased HIV positivity rates. Strategies to optimize institutional adoption may help address stigma-related barriers, strengthen engagement in HIV testing, and support HIV case finding in primary health care settings.
References
- 1.Chen, Y., Wang, Y. F., Gu, Y. Z., Fan, X. R., Lu, Y. H., Li, J. S., Wang, J., Lin, Z. Y., Zhang, C. L., Li, M. D., Ren, N. J., Luo, Z. Z., Zuo, R. F., Xiong, F. C., Kang, Y. T., Lin, X. R., & Hao, C. (2026). Facility-Level Associations Between Use of a Digital Health Platform for Voluntary Counseling and Testing and HIV Testing Outcomes in the Urban Primary Health Care Centers of Guangzhou, China: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 28(4), e83662. https://doi.org/10.2196/83662
Related Research
JMIR human factors
Japanese Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale for Sexually Transmitted Infection-Related Chatbots: Development and Psychometric Validation Study
24 July 2026
The Journal of dermatological treatment
Intralesional human papillomavirus vaccination for cutaneous verrucae: a systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic efficacy
30 June 2026
The New Zealand medical journal
Cancer risk and screening in transgender and gender-diverse individuals on gender-affirming hormone therapy: a review article for the Australasian context
31 May 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service