CompletedNANCT07546474

Telemedicine-Assisted vs Conventional Telephone Instruction in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Sponsor: Siriraj Hospital

Trial Details

Condition	Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA), Emergency Medical Services
Intervention	Telemedicine-Assisted CPR (TA-CPR); Dispatcher-Assisted CPR (DA-CPR)
Phase	NA
Status	Completed
Participants	108
Est. Completion	30 Sept 2025
Last Updated	22 Apr 2026

Primary Outcome

Bystander CPR rate

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients aged ≥18 years * Suspected non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest * Managed by the participating advanced life support (ALS) EMS unit Exclusion Criteria: * Resuscitation declined by patient's relatives * Cardiac arrest occurring in unsafe or inappropriate locations for EMS intervention * EMS-witnessed cardiac arrest * Inability of bystander to communicate in Thai * Cases where ALS unit is not directly dispatched to the scene

Trial Sites

Countries

Thailand

View Registry Entry

Related Analysis

Completed Trial Compares Video vs Voice-Only CPR Instruction for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest — Implications for Emergency Dispatch

Completed Thai trial comparing video-assisted vs voice-only CPR instruction for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest shows potential for improving emergency dispatch protocols. Results could influence Australian EMS telemedicine integration strategies.

Read full article →

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service