Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of an Avatar Guided Intervention for Young Adults Seen in the Emergency Department With Alcohol Use Problems and Suicidal Thoughts
Sponsor: University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Trial Details
| Condition | Binge Alcohol Consumption, Suicidal Ideation |
| Intervention | EA-Avatar; Suicide safety planning app |
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Participants | 60 |
| Est. Completion | 31 Aug 2026 |
| Last Updated | 19 May 2026 |
Primary Outcome
Acceptability as defined by positive ratings on the WAI-TECH-SF; Feasibility of research protocols, defined as follow-up retention; Feasibility of research protocols, defined as adherence to the ecological momentary assessment/daily diary protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * (1) emergency department admission for alcohol- or suicide-related reason since turning 18, OR treated for incidental suicide risk in the emergency department * (2) aged 18-29 * (3) speak, read, and understand English * (4) binge drinking in the past month OR alcohol use problems (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score \> 5) * (5) active suicidal ideation in the past month * (6) owning and having access to a personal smartphone * (7) willingness to be randomized to an avatar guided intervention for alcohol use problems and suicidal thoughts OR a freely available suicide safety planning app * (8) for remote MyChart-based recruitment only, have MyChart activated Exclusion Criteria: * (1) severe cognitive delay, active psychosis, or heavy intoxication that precludes research participation * (2) imminent safety risk and have been recently unsafe to themselves or others * (3) prisoner or are under arrest * (4) not interested or not willing to be randomized to receive the avatar-guided digital intervention or safety plan app * (5) under the care of a legal guardian
Trial Sites
Countries
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service