Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
Journal of clinical pathology
Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumour: A systematic review
AIM: This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the clinicopathological and molecular features of superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumour (SCD34FT), a recently described intermediate-grade soft-tissue neoplasm recognised in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of soft tissue tumours. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched for English-language studies in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science. Retrospective or original case series with ≥3 histologically confirmed cases were selected for review, whereas review articles, single case reports and conference abstracts were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients across 14 selected studies met the inclusion criteria. SCD34FT mainly affected middle-aged adults, with the most common site being the lower extremity. Diffuse CD34 expression was universal across all studies. A high number of cases displayed SynCAM/CADM3 positivity, while WT1 and Pan-CK (focal) were frequent. PRDM10 fusion was detected in 73% of cases, and the most common fusions were PRDM10::MED12 (66%) and PRDM10::CITED2 (28%). Only 9/169 (5.3%) had local recurrences, whereas 4/190 (2.1%) cases had lymph node metastasis, with no distant metastasis or disease-related death. CONCLUSION: SCD34FT is a novel entity with consistent CD34 expression and recurrent PRDM10 rearrangements and shows indolent behaviour. A high index of suspicion for SCD34FT should be warranted in a superficially located tumour with striking nuclear pleomorphism but an unexpectedly low mitotic index. Molecular studies demonstrating PRDM10 rearrangement may be helpful in atypical cases.
19 May 2026
Read appraisal →Journal of robotic surgery
NeuroSAFE-guided robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard RARP: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
Prostate cancer is the most common male malignancy, and although robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used, urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction remain significant issues. NeuroSAFE, an intraoperative frozen section technique aimed at optimizing nerve preservation without compromising cancer control, is increasingly used, but its overall impact on outcomes remains unclear.To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the NeuroSAFE technique during RARP, comparing functional recovery and oncologic outcomes with non-NeuroSAFE approaches.This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251032774). A comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (March, 2026) identified studies reporting oncologic and/or functional outcomes in men undergoing RARP with NeuroSAFE. Two reviewer teams independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using ROBINS-I tool. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was quantified with the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test.Thirteen studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 11 observational cohorts) comprising 22,183 patients met the inclusion criteria. NeuroSAFE was associated with significantly improved postoperative erectile function (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.46-2.74) and urinary continence recovery (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.05-1.76). Positive surgical margins were significantly reduced in the NeuroSAFE group (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.89). No differences in biochemical recurrence were observed (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.43-1.56). Heterogeneity was substantial for some outcomes, and most nonrandomized studies carried a serious risk of bias, which limits causal inference.This systematic review and meta-analysis, including randomized evidence, demonstrates that NeuroSAFE is a safe and effective intraoperative strategy that is associated with improved erectile function, enhanced continence recovery, and negative surgical margins without compromising oncologic outcomes. These findings support integrating NeuroSAFE into surgical decision-making for patients undergoing RARP, particularly when nerve preservation can be achieved without compromising oncologic outcomes.In this study, we compared a surgical approach that uses real-time analysis during prostate cancer surgery with the standard technique. This method helps surgeons decide how much tissue to preserve while the operation is still ongoing. We found that this approach is safe and may improve recovery of urinary continence and sexual function, while also reducing the risk of leaving cancer behind, without compromising cancer control.
14 May 2026
Read appraisal →