Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
Comparison of neuropsychological side effects between contemporary radiofrequency ablative neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders and conventional neurosurgical procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE). OBJECTIVE: To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31-11.70%; vascular: 0.52-22.90%; oncology: 0.94-17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31-12%; vascular: 0.40-1.96% and oncology: 0.84-1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.
16 May 2026
Read appraisal →Neurosurgical review
Deep brain stimulation for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review of target-specific outcomes and stereotactic technical considerations
Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects approximately 20-30% of patients, and a substantial proportion develop clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a potential neurosurgical intervention targeting dysfunctional cortico-striato-limbic circuitry. However, technical heterogeneity and limited clinical data constrain interpretation of outcomes. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251080715). Seven electronic databases were searched from inception through January 31, 2025. Clinical studies investigating DBS in TRS or CRS were included. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. Data extraction emphasized stereotactic targeting methods, hardware configurations, stimulation parameters, and clinical outcomes. The total number of study is 6. We excluded paper by Manssuer 2023. The total study population comprises 21 patients. Seven studies involving 21 patients met inclusion criteria. Targets included the nucleus accumbens (NAcc; n = 11), substantia nigra (SNr; n = 1), habenula (HB; n = 2), subgenual cingulate (SCG; n = 4), subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC; n = 3). Reported PANSS total score changes ranged widely (11%-85.7%), reflecting substantial inter-individual variability and methodological limitations. Surgical complications occurred in 3 of 21 patients (14.2%), including infection and hemorrhage. All cases utilized open-loop stimulation and conventional cylindrical leads. Current evidence suggests a preliminary therapeutic signal for DBS in highly selected CRS patients, particularly with NAcc targeting. However, conclusions remain limited by small sample sizes, technical heterogeneity, and absence of controlled trials. Future investigations should prioritize standardized stereotactic reporting, volumetric lead reconstruction, and long-term safety assessment within specialized neurosurgical research settings. PROSPERO CRD420251080715.
10 May 2026
Read appraisal →