Evidence-Based Medicine

Research Appraisals

Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.

Showing 2 appraisals

Systematic ReviewEvidence: Weak
55CEBM

JMIR human factors

Engaging Older Adults With Neurocognitive Disorders in Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Population aging is associated with a growing prevalence of neurocognitive disorders among adults aged 65 years and older. Digital health technologies offer promising opportunities to support cognitive health and well-being in this population. However, their effectiveness largely depends on users' level of engagement. Despite the recognized importance of engagement in digital health, limited evidence exists on how engagement is conceptualized, measured, and related to intervention outcomes among older adults living with neurocognitive disorders. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to describe how engagement with digital health technologies among older adults with neurocognitive disorders is conceptualized and measured, examine the relationship between engagement and the effectiveness of digital health interventions, and identify factors that facilitate or hinder engagement. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. A comprehensive search strategy, developed in collaboration with an information specialist, was applied to MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, without date restrictions. Empirical studies involving adults aged 65 years and older living with neurocognitive disorders and using digital health technologies were included. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by at least 2 reviewers, and the results were synthesized narratively. RESULTS: Of the 1665 records identified after duplicate removal, 2 studies met the inclusion criteria. One study examined computerized cognitive stimulation and cognitive engagement programs among community-dwelling older adults with mild neurocognitive disorders, whereas the other explored the use of a personalized digital reminiscence application in long-term care settings among individuals with major neurocognitive disorders. No study used a validated instrument to directly measure engagement. However, observable indicators and markers related to the behavioral, cognitive, and affective components of engagement were reported. Both studies also documented concurrent cognitive or psychosocial outcomes. Factors facilitating engagement included professional support, content personalization, and involvement of informal caregivers, whereas limiting factors included cognitive fluctuations, fatigue, technical complexity, and reliance on external support. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review highlights a significant gap in the literature regarding the explicit conceptualization and standardized measurement of engagement with digital health technologies among older adults living with neurocognitive disorders. The findings underscore the need to develop and apply multidimensional, context-sensitive engagement measurement tools tailored to this population to better understand and optimize digital health interventions.

18 July 2026

Read appraisal →
Systematic ReviewEvidence: Weak
45CEBM

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology

Association between circadian rhythm disturbances and cognitive decline in the elderly: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Circadian rhythm dysregulation may contribute to sleep-wake disorders and cognitive impairment. In the elderly, circadian abnormalities have been observed in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), suggesting a possible association between neurocognitive deficits and circadian dysfunctions. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between circadian rhythm disturbances and cognitive decline in the population aged ≥ 60 years. METHODS: This systematic review included studies evaluating the association between circadian rhythm disturbances and cognitive decline in elderly individuals aged 60 years or older, with self-reported or objectively measured sleep data and cognitive assessment via questionnaires. Studies tracking progression from MCI to Alzheimer's disease (AD) were retained, as they capture circadian changes across the MCI-to-dementia continuum. Studies that evaluated other sleep disorders and/or other conditions of cognitive impairment exclusively or that did not specify the mean age of the participants were excluded. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, totaling 5,731 participants (5,707 eligible for analysis). Circadian exposures were organized into three domains: (1) actigraphic rest-activity rhythm metrics (amplitude, robustness, interdaily stability, intradaily variability, and acrophase); (2) sleep quality and architecture parameters (efficiency, fragmentation, latency, WASO, and melatonin timing); and (3) circadian-disrupting lifestyle exposures (rotating night shift work). Across these domains, circadian dysregulation was consistently associated with a higher risk of development or progression of MCI and dementia. CONCLUSION: Circadian and sleep disturbances negatively impact cognitive health in the elderly, reinforcing the need for further research on this association and its public health implications.

17 July 2026

Read appraisal →