Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
Neurological research
Federated deep learning model for epilepsy seizure detection using electroencephalogram (EEG) signal
OBJECTIVES: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures due to abnormal brain activity, which affects individuals' health and quality of life. Traditional seizure detection methods face challenges related to data privacy and security as well as difficulty in fully capturing both temporal and spatial relationships within the Electroencephalography signal. To address these limitations, a Federated Learning Enabled Unified Transformer model is proposed. METHODS: The Federated Learning with Paillier Homomorphic Encryption is deployed for preserving data privacy and enabling collaborative model training. Adaptive noise filtering and Independent Component Analysis are deployed to remove the noise and artifacts. The Multi-Scale Wavelet Coefficient is applied for signal decomposition that effectively extracts seizure-related features by decomposing Electroencephalography signals into multiple sub-bands. The Hybrid Graph-Based Attention Framework integrated Edge-Enhanced Graph Convolutional Networks for spatial feature extraction and Spectral Graph Attention for frequency-based feature selection, and refining feature representation for improving the classification accuracy. Further, the proposed technique utilizes a Unified Transformer model for seizure classification that efficiently captures temporal and spatial dependencies in Electroencephalography signals. RESULTS: The proposed model is validated on three datasets and attains 98.91% accuracy, 98.93% security, and 98.82% precision. The simulation outcomes indicate that the Federated Learning Enabled Unified Transformer model achieved outstanding performance when compared to existing models. DISCUSSION: The Federated Learning Enabled Unified Transformer model provided a superior performance by integrating Federated learning and hybrid Deep Learning models. It ensures that the model is more suitable for healthcare users.
2 Aug 2026
Read appraisal →Journal of medical Internet research
Co-Lifecycle Governance for Learning Medical AI: A Hybrid Convergence Framework for Adaptive Regulatory Oversight
Artificial intelligence (AI) in health care is increasingly defined not by static algorithms but by adaptive intelligence-systems that evolve over time through interactions with data, clinicians, and clinical environments. This adaptive capacity creates a structural mismatch with regulatory frameworks built for technologies whose behavior remains static. As AI models drift, recalibrate, or degrade in real-world contexts, they dissolve the linear boundaries between design, deployment, and clinical interpretation. These temporal, epistemic, and organizational frictions expose responsibility gaps that cannot be resolved through incremental modifications to legacy oversight structures. Regulators across major jurisdictions are beginning to respond to these challenges, though with differing orientations. The United States advances mechanisms for predictable adaptation, including Predetermined Change Control Plans, real-world evidence frameworks, and life cycle-oriented quality management reforms. The European Union emphasizes precautionary, rights-based governance through the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) and modernized liability rules. South Korea, operating within a hyperconnected digital health ecosystem, has introduced the Digital Medical Products Act (DMPA), one of the world's first comprehensive statutory frameworks for learning medical AI. Despite philosophical differences, these regulatory trajectories converge on a shared insight: learning AI systems cannot be governed by static rules or episodic evaluation. This viewpoint proposes Co-Lifecycle Governance as a conceptual framework to synchronize regulatory oversight with adaptive intelligence. Rather than treating oversight as a discrete event, Co-Lifecycle Governance frames regulation as a continuous, synchronized process grounded in 4 pillars: continuous validation, agile change management, proactive performance surveillance, and distributed accountability. Each pillar functions as a structural antidote to the responsibility frictions that arise when AI systems evolve faster than expectations surrounding them. Together, these pillars provide a governance grammar capable of supporting safe, iterative model improvement while maintaining system-level trust. Drawing from the strengths of US predictability, European Union accountability, and Korean scalability, this paper outlines a hybrid convergence pathway that synthesizes predictability, accountability, and operational feasibility. Learning AI will not wait for governance to catch up; oversight must evolve in lockstep with adaptive intelligence. Co-Lifecycle Governance offers a foundation for regulatory systems that not only regulate learning AI but also learn with it-at the speed at which adaptive intelligence actually changes.
20 May 2026
Read appraisal →