Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 4 appraisals
Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America
Artificial Intelligence Regulation in the United States: Current Landscape and Implications for Rheumatology
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical tools used in rheumatology, including imaging interpretation, longitudinal disease monitoring, and electronic health record-based decision support. AI has moved from the periphery of biomedical research to an operational component of clinical care, increasingly embedded in electronic health records, imaging platforms, and decision support systems. In rheumatology, where care is longitudinal, AI systems offer substantial promise-but also poses distinct risks. Together, these commitments-advancing humanity, ensuring equity, engaging impacted individuals, improving workforce well-being, monitoring performance, innovating and learning, and promoting sustainability-operationalize trustworthy AI systems across a patient's care trajectory.
2 Aug 2026
Read appraisal →Journal of biomedical informatics
A comprehensive survey of AI agents in healthcare
OBJECTIVE: This survey aims to systematically map the rapidly evolving landscape of AI agents in healthcare. It addresses the critical need to adapt general-purpose agentic frameworks characterized by autonomy, planning, and tool use to the high-stakes, safety-critical constraints of medical decision-making and patient care. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of over 200 recent studies, synthesizing literature from major academic databases. We developed a holistic taxonomy that traces the full lifecycle of healthcare agents, analyzing perception modalities, core technical architectures, and evaluation protocols specific to autonomous systems. RESULTS: The review presents a quantitative landscape analysis showing exponential growth in the field. We structure the domain into three pillars: (1) Perception of multi-modal clinical data (e.g., EHR, imaging, genomics); (2) Agent Capabilities, including tool use, reasoning, memory, and multi-agent collaboration; and (3) an Application Ecosystem organized by stakeholder roles (clinicians, patients, researchers, and administrators). Additionally, we categorize evaluation frameworks, and discuss the deployment readiness of current systems across technical, evidentiary, and governance dimensions. Finally, we identify challenges for advancing healthcare agents from controlled evaluation toward real-world clinical integration. A continuously updated repository of related papers is available at https://github.com/AgenticHealthAI/Awesome-AI-Agents-for-Healthcare. CONCLUSION: AI agents offer significant potential to enhance healthcare through autonomous reasoning and workflow integration. However, current research remains largely concentrated in benchmark and controlled evaluation settings, and the translation into clinical practice will require advances in reliability, privacy protection, governance, and operational integration.
4 July 2026
Read appraisal →Journal of medical Internet research
A Futures Framework for Clinical AI Governance: Anticipating Emerging Risks, Shifting Roles, and Regulatory Challenges
This viewpoint develops the futures framework for clinical artificial intelligence governance (FF-CAIG), a conceptual and anticipatory framework for organizing emerging governance challenges in clinical artificial intelligence (AI). Although life cycle-oriented oversight is increasingly reflected in clinical AI regulation and institutional governance, existing approaches remain more developed for near-term validation, current-state assurance, and retrospective risk detection than for longer-horizon sociotechnical change. This gap is increasingly relevant, as AI systems become more complex, adaptive, and autonomous, and as they become more deeply embedded in care relationships and accountability structures. FF-CAIG is grounded in 3 futures methodologies: the 3 horizons model, scenario planning, and causal layered analysis. It is operationalized through an emerging clinical AI risk taxonomy that links these methods to governance domains. Its practical outputs include horizon classification, risk-domain mapping, scenario stress-testing findings, accountability-chain mapping, and horizon-scaled minimum governance actions for deployment or continued use. Applied across near-term, transitional, and longer-term horizons, the framework proposes cross-horizon priorities, including stronger predeployment equity evaluation, clearer life cycle accountability, clinician AI oversight competencies, and safeguards for increasingly autonomous or AI-mediated care systems. We illustrate FF-CAIG through 3 representative clinical AI deployment patterns and discuss its limitations, including differential compliance burdens, risks of overdocumentation, variable feasibility across jurisdictions, and the need for empirical validation. FF-CAIG is intended not as a prescriptive policy instrument or validated assessment tool, but as a structured analytic approach for regulators, health system leaders, developers, and researchers seeking prospective and systems-oriented approaches to clinical AI governance.
30 June 2026
Read appraisal →Journal of medical Internet research
Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Large Language Models in Health Care Communication: Scoping Review
BACKGROUND: Effective health care communication is crucial in the medical field. However, effective communication in clinical practice still faces numerous obstacles, and large language models (LLMs) offer various possibilities for improving the quality of medical communication. To date, there are no published reviews on the use of LLMs in health care communication. OBJECTIVE: This review sought to summarize the applications and challenges of LLMs in health care communication and to identify directions for future research. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 2018 to November 2025. The search and selection process followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guideline and the PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension) checklist. Eligible studies used LLMs to facilitate health care communication among the public, patients, and clinicians. Following rigorous data extraction and cross-checking, we conducted a quantitative analysis of characteristics of the included literature. Furthermore, using communication accommodation theory as a framework, we identified application patterns of LLMs in health care communication and summarized current challenges and future directions. RESULTS: Ninety-six studies were included in this review, all published between 2023 and 2025, summarizing 4 patterns of LLM application in health care communication: transforming medical information (n=30), facilitating dynamic interaction (n=38), empowering communication capabilities (n=10), and optimizing clinical workflows (n=18). The role of LLMs in health care communication is undergoing a paradigm shift from "static information processing" to "dynamic intelligent interaction." Although they show great promise for practical applications, current evaluation methods and dimensions exhibit significant heterogeneity. Furthermore, LLMs still face multiple challenges in their practical application in health care communication, including technical reliability issues, social trust and adoption, interaction and access barriers, and clinical integration challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous studies that merely touched upon the challenges and future directions, this scoping review uses communication accommodation theory to systematically map the application patterns and developmental landscape of LLM-mediated health care communication. Health care communication powered by LLMs holds significant innovation potential and is currently still in the early stages of rapid development. Future research should focus on optimizing model performance, strengthening ethical governance frameworks, enhancing human-machine collaboration models, and ensuring responsible application of LLMs in health care through rigorous empirical validation.
28 June 2026
Read appraisal →