Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
BMJ open
Facilitators of and barriers to teamwork between operating room nurses and other practitioners: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
OBJECTIVES: Seamless collaboration in the operating room is the critical foundation for patient safety and successful outcomes. This synergy enhances efficiency, minimises errors and is a key determinant of the final surgical quality. The objective of this study is to synthesise qualitative studies on facilitators of and barriers to teamwork between operating room nurses (ORNs) and other practitioners. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted across nine electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science (Core Collection), CINAHL, PsycINFO, CNKI, WanFang and Vip. The search covered the period from 1 January 2014 to 30 September 2025. The search strategy used both medical subject headings and free-text terms, supplemented by the snowball method and grey literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Qualitative studies exploring teamwork involving ORNs were included. Of 4839 initially retrieved records, 29 studies finally met the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently extracted data, including the author, year of publication, country, study design, study objective, interview location, number of participants, age, methods of data collection and analysis and duration of interviews. The key findings were synthesised into two overarching themes: facilitators (eg, professional skills, role awareness, team familiarity, patient-centred culture, effective leadership) of and barriers (eg, individualistic behaviour, hierarchical culture, insufficient resources, punitive management, environmental constraints) to teamwork between ORNs and other practitioners. A meta-synthesis was conducted to synthesise study results from different groups and countries. NVivo 15 was used for data management. RESULTS: A total of 29 qualitative studies (published between 2014 and 2025) were included in this study. Key facilitators of teamwork included professional skills, role awareness, team familiarity, patient-centred culture and effective leadership. Major barriers encompassed individualistic behaviours, punitive management, hierarchical culture, environmental constraints and insufficient resources. These factors worked across individual, interpersonal and systemic levels to shape OR teamwork. CONCLUSION: Optimising OR teamwork requires a multifaceted approach simultaneously addressing these facilitators and barriers. Interventions should simultaneously cultivate individual competencies (eg, skills, role awareness), foster positive team dynamics (eg, familiarity, psychological safety, inclusive leadership), and rectify systemic issues (eg, hierarchical culture, resource constraints, punitive management). In this way, teamwork between ORNs and other practitioners can be enhanced, thereby contributing to improved perioperative safety and outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024506414.
9 Apr 2026
Read appraisal →European journal of pediatrics
Facilitator-guided vs self-guided debriefing in immersive virtual reality paediatric emergency training: a randomised pilot study on learning outcomes and feasibility
UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of immersive virtual reality (VR)-based paediatric emergency training, comparing facilitator-guided with self-guided debriefing methods. In a single-blinded, randomised controlled pilot trial, 24 healthcare professionals (12 interprofessional dyads) were randomised to VR-based paediatric emergency training followed by either facilitator- or self-guided debriefing. Both groups received a standardised preparatory lecture and skills workshop. We collected data on the feasibility of the interventions and additional trial procedures. For pre- and post-performance assessment, all dyads were video-recorded whilst managing a mannequin-based paediatric emergency. Two independent, blinded raters assessed the dyads' teamwork, ABCDE adherence, and time to critical actions based on the videos. We also collected data on participants' cognitive load and perceived effectiveness of the two debriefing methods. The study demonstrated the feasibility of interprofessional VR-based paediatric emergency training with both facilitator- and self-guided debriefing in a clinical setting. Twenty-two healthcare professionals completed the intervention, and 20 completed follow-up. VR was acceptable and usable, though 46% of participants reported some cybersickness. Additional trial procedures were feasible but required substantial logistical coordination. VR training significantly improved teamwork (facilitator-guided mean 1.2, confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 1.9, p = 0.005; self-guided mean 1.4, CI 0.8 to 2.0, p < 0.001) and ABCDE adherence (facilitator-guided mean 0.5, CI 0.1 to 1.0, p = 0.02; self-guided mean 0.5, CI 0.1 to 0.9, p = 0.01), with similar outcomes between the debriefing methods. However, participants perceived the facilitator-guided debriefing to be more effective (mean difference 1.4, CI 0.1 to 2.7, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Immersive VR-based paediatric emergency training with facilitator-guided and self-guided debriefing was feasible in a pilot context and yielded comparable performance outcomes. A larger, adequately powered trial is warranted to formally evaluate non-inferiority between debriefing methods. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Simulation-based paediatric emergency training improves clinical outcomes, but widespread implementation is limited by logistical challenges and high costs. • Immersive virtual reality (VR) may help overcome these barriers, yet evidence on its feasibility and effectiveness in this context is limited. WHAT IS NEW: • VR-based paediatric emergency training is feasible and effectively improves interprofessional performance. • Self-guided and facilitator-guided debriefing yielded comparable outcomes, highlighting the potential for scalable use.
5 Apr 2026
Read appraisal →