Evidence-Based Medicine

Research Appraisals

Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.

Showing 1 appraisal

Systematic ReviewEvidence: Moderate
70CEBM

International health

Neglected tropical diseases in conflict-related humanitarian emergency settings: a systematic review of the literature

Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are a group of 21 conditions affecting an estimated 1 billion people worldwide, causing significant mortality and morbidity. WHO has targeted their control, elimination or eradication by 2030, while highlighting that conflict and humanitarian emergencies are risks to achieving this. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was undertaken, using terms related to conflict-related humanitarian emergencies (CRHE), based on the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project codebook terms for defining emergencies and terms including all WHO-defined NTDs. After a two-stage screening process, 26 papers were included. Common challenges for NTD programmes in CRHE were healthcare access, infrastructure, population movement and data quality. Multisectoral collaboration between actors in conflict-settings was offered as a learning for NTD programmes, along with community participation and decentralisation. Evidence gaps were identified in the knowledge base for certain NTDs and in high-quality evidence for interventions in CRHE. Collaboration is a key area for focused improvement for NTD programmes in CRHE. This should be across sectors and extend to research and analysis approaches, to ensure the most effective interventions are identified and implemented and that NTD road map targets can be achieved.

12 May 2026

Read appraisal →