Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
PloS one
Does delayed exercise-based priming improve subsequent athletic performance? A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.
This systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis examined whether delayed exercise-based priming improves subsequent athletic performance. Following PRISMA 2020 principles, 3,095 records were identified; after removing 1,107 duplicates, 1,988 unique records were screened, 212 full-text reports were assessed, 186 reports were excluded at eligibility, and 26 studies were included. Eighteen studies contributed 46 effect sizes to the quantitative synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 principles calibrated for crossover exercise trials, and certainty was evaluated using GRADE. A three-level random-effects model showed a small positive average effect of delayed priming on subsequent performance (g = 0.232, 95% CI [0.092, 0.372], p = .002), with cluster-robust inference supporting the same conclusion (p = .004). The prediction interval crossed zero (-0.265 to 0.730), and the overall certainty of evidence was low. Delayed exercise-based priming can be used as a practical competition-day strategy when embedded in planned preparation windows, although protocol selection and athlete response should be checked in training before competition use.
31 July 2026
Read appraisal →PloS one
Hamstring strength assessment methods in sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis of post-activity strength decrements, asymmetry benchmarks, and measurement reliability.
Hamstring strain injuries (HSI) represent one of the most prevalent and recurrent injuries in sport, making reliable strength assessment essential for neuromuscular monitoring in athletic populations. Despite the breadth of available testing modalities, no comprehensive synthesis of assessment methods, their reliability, post-activity strength responses, or normative asymmetry values has been undertaken. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the reliability of hamstring strength assessment methods, quantify the time-course of strength decrements following competition, establish normative inter-limb asymmetry benchmarks, and identify gaps to guide future assessment practices. PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to November 1, 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. A total of 161 studies were included in qualitative synthesis and 106 in quantitative analysis. Isokinetic dynamometry was the most frequently used modality, followed by force platform assessments and Nordic hamstring-based devices, with a clear upward trend in field-based testing observed after 2010. Multiple modalities demonstrate good reliability, sensitivity to post-activity fatigue, and comparable patterns to detect inter-limb asymmetries, supporting their use across varied applied settings. Hamstring strength deficits persisted for 24-72 hours following on-field activity, identifying a critical vulnerability window during congested schedules. Minor inter-limb asymmetries of approximately 3-4% appear normative and should not be considered clinically meaningful in isolation. Practitioners should establish individualized baselines and integrate routine monitoring with evidence-based recovery strategies to mitigate HSI risk throughout competitive seasons.
23 July 2026
Read appraisal →