Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
JBJS reviews
One-Stage or Two-Stage Revision for Infected Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following shoulder arthroplasty is a devastating complication associated with substantial morbidity and revision burden. While 2-stage revision has traditionally been regarded as the gold standard for chronic shoulder PJI, single-stage revision has emerged as a potential alternative. The aim of this systematic review was to directly compare infection-related outcomes and complications between single-stage and 2-stage revision arthroplasties for shoulder PJI. METHODS: This systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251159566) and conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched up to September 22, 2025. Comparative observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating single-stage vs. 2-stage revision for shoulder PJI in adults were eligible; no RCTs were identified. Primary outcomes were reinfection and infection control success; overall complications were secondary. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated within each study and pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Thirteen retrospective comparative studies involving 260 patients (127 single-stage and 133 two-stage) were included. Compared with 2-stage revision, single-stage revision showed a lower, but not statistically significant, odds of reinfection (OR 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-1.04; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%) and overall complications (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.18-1.53; p = 0.24; I2 = 0%) and a higher, but nonsignificant, odds of infection control success (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.45-5.40; p = 0.48; I2 = 17%). CONCLUSION: Single-stage revision demonstrated infection control and complication rates comparable with 2-stage revision for shoulder PJI. Although no statistically significant differences were observed, trends favored single-stage revision. Given that the certainty of the evidence was graded as low, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and high-quality RCTs are required to define optimal patient selection and surgical strategy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
30 July 2026
Read appraisal →Journal of robotic surgery
Robot-assisted peritoneal flap vaginoplasty in gender-affirming genital reconstruction: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis
Robot-assisted peritoneal flap vaginoplasty has emerged as an evolving reconstructive option in gender-affirming genital surgery. This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence regarding its perioperative, functional canal, and postoperative safety outcomes. This study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to May 2026. Eligible studies included transfeminine or gender-diverse individuals undergoing robot-assisted peritoneal flap-based vaginoplasty with extractable clinical outcomes. Continuous outcomes were synthesized as weighted mean estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and overall postoperative complications were pooled using Stata version 18.0. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed. Ten studies involving 974 patients were included. The pooled mean operative time was 305.37 min (95% CI 244.62, 366.12), and the pooled length of hospital stay was 5.80 days (95% CI 4.72, 6.87). At the last available follow-up, pooled neovaginal depth was 13.41 cm (95% CI 12.86, 13.96), and pooled neovaginal width was 3.61 cm (95% CI 3.55, 3.67). The pooled overall postoperative complication rate was approximately 30.1%. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the pooled estimates were not driven by any single study. Robot-assisted peritoneal flap vaginoplasty appears feasible and may achieve neovaginal dimensions broadly comparable to those reported for other full-depth vaginoplasty approaches. However, predominantly retrospective single-arm evidence precludes conclusions regarding superiority and highlights the need for standardized prospective studies with longer follow-up and patient-reported outcomes.
20 June 2026
Read appraisal →