Evidence-Based Medicine

Research Appraisals

Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.

Showing 4 appraisals

Systematic ReviewEvidence: Moderate
80CEBM

European journal of pediatrics

Ambulatory hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in pediatric chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

UNLABELLED: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In the general pediatric population, hypertension is associated with an increased risk of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH); however, the strength of this association varies in the pediatric CKD literature. A lack of consensus on optimal blood pressure (BP) targets for this population contributes to variability in clinical practice. This study aims to determine the association between ambulatory hypertension and LVH in pediatric CKD. A systematic literature search was conducted on five databases from 1974 to 2025. The mean left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and odds of LVH was compared between normotensive and hypertensive groups. The association between LVMI and 24-h systolic/diastolic blood pressure, day/night systolic/diastolic blood pressure, and 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP), was determined. Fifty-one full text studies (n = 6509 children) were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Pediatric CKD patients with ambulatory hypertension demonstrated increased LVMI (mean difference 5.15 g/m2.7 (95% CI 3.16, 7.15) and increased risk of LVH odds ratio 2.82 (95% CI 2.18, 3.65) to normotensive controls. LVMI was significantly lower among children with a 24-h MAP < 50th percentile (- 8.2 g/m2.7, 95% CI - 16.0, - 0.4) and 24-h SBP between the 50 and 90th percentiles (- 10.8 g/m2.7, 95% CI - 20.8, - 0.8) compared to those with 24-h MAP or 24 h SBP > 90th percentile, respectively. CONCLUSION: In children with CKD, ambulatory hypertension is associated with elevated risk of LVH and increased LVMI. However, there was significant heterogeneity among the included studies with respect to study design and definition of outcomes. Timely detection of hypertensive target organ injury is imperative to mitigate future cardiovascular disease in pediatric CKD patients.Prospero Registration: CRD 42023426891. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Hypertension is a critical predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in children with CKD. Hypertension-induced target organ damage such as LVH may predict future cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk populations. Despite this, there remains considerable variability in clinical blood pressure targets and monitoring practices. Our findings highlight the importance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in detecting subclinical cardiovascular injury, supporting its integration into routine CKD care to improve risk stratification and treatment decisions. WHAT IS NEW: • This meta-analysis establishes a robust association between ambulatory hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in children with CKD, demonstrating that higher blood pressure burden is linked to increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Notably, children with 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) above the 90th percentile exhibited significantly greater LVMI, reinforcing the impact of sustained hypertension on cardiac remodelling in pediatric CKD. • The strong association between ambulatory hypertension and LVH underscores the urgent need for evidence-based BP thresholds that minimize cardiovascular risk in pediatric CKD. Early identification of hypertensive target organ damage may enable timely therapeutic interventions to prevent long-term cardiovascular complications. Future studies should focus on defining optimal BP targets and evaluating the efficacy of antihypertensive strategies tailored to pediatric CKD. Standardizing BP measurement approaches may further refine hypertension management and improve cardiovascular outcomes in this vulnerable population.

14 June 2026

Read appraisal →
otherEvidence: Moderate
75CEBM

Current pain and headache reports

Telemedicine in Pediatric Headache in a Post-COVID-19 World: A Narrative Review and Practical Implementation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet access to pediatric headache specialists remains limited due to workforce scarcities and geographic disparities. This review examines the evolution of telemedicine in headache care, evaluates current evidence for safety and efficacy, and explores its role in improving access and multidisciplinary management. RECENT FINDINGS: Randomized trials and observational studies demonstrate that telemedicine provides clinical outcomes comparable to in-person visits with high patient satisfaction and reduced logistical burden. Emerging data support its safety in non-acute headache evaluation as well as benefit of supporting multidisciplinary care. Professional societies, including the American Headache Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics, endorse telemedicine as an appropriate modality for headache management. Telemedicine has matured into a sustainable, evidence-based approach for pediatric headache care. When implemented thoughtfully, it expands access, supports multidisciplinary treatment, and maintains safety, positioning it as an essential component of future headache care delivery models.

12 May 2026

Read appraisal →
Systematic ReviewEvidence: Moderate
75CEBM

European journal of pediatrics

Efficacy of physiotherapeutic interventions in the management of functional constipation in pediatric and adolescent populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

UNLABELLED: To evaluate the efficacy of physiotherapeutic interventions in the management of functional constipation (FC) in pediatric and adolescent populations, and to analyze the methodological quality of the available evidence. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted (February-March 2025). Studies including participants aged 18 years diagnosed with FC, treated with pelvic floor physiotherapy versus conventional medical treatment, were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale (Physiotherapy Evidence Database). Seven clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis with sample sizes ranging from 45 to 400 participants (total n = 775). The interventions covered pelvic floor exercises, biofeedback, telerehabilitation, visceral mobilization, and electrostimulation. The majority showed improvements in painful defecation, fecal consistency, and quality of life, with less consistent results in defecatory frequency (MD = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.35 to 1.65). However, the marked heterogeneity in protocols (type, intensity, duration), variability in assessment instruments, and frequent co-intervention with polyethylene glycol (PEG) hinder comparison between studies and limit external validity. Follow-ups shorter than 12 months and the absence of blinding of participants and therapists constitute additional risks of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor physiotherapy appears to be a promising adjuvant intervention in the treatment of pediatric FC, with positive effects on symptoms and quality of life. Nevertheless, multicenter trials with standardized protocols, large samples, and prolonged follow-up are required to confirm its efficacy and long-term sustainability. WHAT IS KNOWN: •Despite the clinical use of physiotherapy, there was no quantitative synthesis integrating its efficacy against standard medical treatment, nor had its specific effect size on defecatory pain and quality of life been established in the pediatric population. WHAT IS NEW: •This meta-analysis confi rms that pelvic fl oor physiotherapy is an eff ective adjuvant with a large effect size, demonstrating consistent improvements in reducing painful defecation and enhancing the biopsychosocial dimensions of quality of life.

12 Apr 2026

Read appraisal →
observationalEvidence: Moderate
80CEBM

European journal of pediatrics

Predicting coronary artery abnormalities in Kawasaki disease: Model development and validation

Routine echocardiography at one month after diagnosis is the current standard for screening coronary artery abnormalities (CAA), a major complication of Kawasaki disease. The study aimed to develop and validate models to predict CAA and assess whether routine echocardiography could be safely reduced in low-risk patients. Two prospective multicenter Japanese registries were utilized: PEACOCK (development/internal validation) and Post-RAISE (external validation). Variables obtained within one week of diagnosis were used to predict CAA at one month after diagnosis, defined as a maximum coronary artery Z score (Zmax) ≥ 2. The models included simple models using the previous maximum Z score only, logistic regression models, and machine learning models (LightGBM and XGBoost). Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were assessed. Among 4,973 PEACOCK and 2,438 Post-RAISE patients, the CAA incidence was 5.5% and 6.8%, respectively. Twenty-two models were developed using 29 variables. For external validation, a simple model using the maximum Z score at week 1 produced an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79; adding other variables or using more complex models did not increase the AUC by more than 0.02. The models failed to efficiently reduce the number of echocardiographic examinations while minimizing missed cased of CAA.Conclusion: Until superior predictors are identified, routine echocardiography at one month after diagnosis should remain the standard practice.

9 Apr 2026

Read appraisal →