Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering
Deep Learning-Based Surrogate Model of Subject-Specific Finite-Element Analysis for Vertebrae
Subject-specific finite-element analysis (FEA) models enable accurate simulation of vertebral biomechanics but are often time-consuming to construct and solve under varying conditions. This study presents a novel deep learning (DL)/machine learning (ML)-based surrogate model that predicts stress distributions in vertebral bodies with high efficiency. The model integrates vertebral shape encoding and employs separate decoding branches for surface and internal nodes. It was trained on 3,960 synthetic L1 vertebrae generated via data augmentation from 42 real computed tomography (CT) scans. Evaluation on independent test samples yielded a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0596 MPa and an $\mathrm{R}^{2}$ of 0.864 for von Mises stress. Visualization results confirm strong agreement between predicted and FEA-computed stress patterns, with localized discrepancies observed at the anteroinferior margin and pedicles. Moreover, an end-to-end automated pipeline was established based on the developed model, reducing the total processing time from 90-120min to approximately 134-154s per subject. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed surrogate model to facilitate rapid, subject-specific biomechanical assessments in clinical workflows.
3 July 2026
Read appraisal →Calcified tissue international
Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Prediction Using Administrative Health Data: A Systematic Review
To systematically review Machine Learning (ML) fracture risk prediction models developed solely using administrative data, evaluating their development, performance, risk of bias, and concerns regarding applicability. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, IEEE, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines (up to November 2025). We included studies developing or validating ML models for osteoporotic fracture risk in adults using administrative data without clinical measurements. Risk of bias and concerns for applicability were assessed using the PROBAST tool. Seven studies were included from 3435 initial records. A range of of ML models were utilized, including Random Forests, XGBoost, LASSO-regularized Logistic Regression and Neural Networks. Discriminative performance was moderate-to-good, with best Area Under the Curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.818 for osteoporotic fractures in general to 0.905 for hip fractures only. While five studies showed low risk of bias, five raised applicability concerns due to using specific subpopulations or features with database characteristics. Only two studies used external validation and none directly evaluated clinical utility of the models. ML models using solely administrative data show some promise as scalable, automated tools for fracture risk prediction without requiring manual clinical input. However, clinical implementation is hindered by limited external validation and a lack of formal utility evaluation of the models. Future research should prioritize more rigorous external validation and recalibration of the existing models, more so than the development of novel models, ensuring they are robust, interpretable, and integrable into future clinical workflows.
28 June 2026
Read appraisal →