Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
JMIR formative research
Exploring Breast Cancer Survivors' Preferences for Text Messaging-Based Mobile Health Interventions Targeting Sleep and Physical Activity: Qualitative Study
BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances and low physical activity are common among breast cancer (BC) survivors and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Given the increased access to technological devices and the growing popularity of SMS text messaging-based mobile health interventions, these tools have the potential to both address sleep disturbances and promote physical activity in a scalable and cost-effective way. To understand and make effective use of these tools, it is important to consider the preferences of BC survivors with sleep disturbances, including how SMS text messaging-based mobile health interventions could deliver interventions involving physical activity and sleep hygiene. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the perspectives and preferences of BC survivors regarding text messaging-based mobile interventions targeting sleep and physical activity. METHODS: Three focus groups (n=13 participants) and 3 individual interviews (n=3) were conducted from May 2020 to March 2021 with 16 BC survivors (mean age=59.3, SD 8.9 y) currently experiencing sleep disturbances. The interview questions focused on their experiences with poor sleep and preferences for text messaging-based mobile health interventions. Thematic analysis was applied to the deidentified transcriptions of audio recordings. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) attitudes toward health interventions delivered through text messaging, (2) specific user needs, and (3) technology usage habits and preferences. Most participants reported a positive attitude toward the possibility of using technology to help improve their sleep and increase their physical activity. Most expressed a high level of acceptance toward some technologies, such as text messaging and mobile apps, but not others, such as voice interactions. In terms of desired features, reminders and accountability features, such as meeting physical activity goals, were mentioned most frequently. In addition, incorporating bedtime and relaxation exercise reminders was thought to be helpful. Regarding time and frequency, a daily reminder scheduled for 1 hour before bedtime was found to be acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The insights have been used to guide the development of a messaging-based mobile health intervention for improving sleep and physical activity in BC survivors. Future research will focus on delivering an intervention addressing these health behaviors and assessing its acceptability and effectiveness.
11 July 2026
Read appraisal →JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Safer Sleep Guidance in Standalone UK Smartphone Apps for Parents of Newborns and Infants: Systematic mHealth App Review
BACKGROUND: Parents are increasingly using smartphone apps to help guide decision-making around aspects of caregiving, including safer sleep. However, it remains unclear whether the guidance provided aligns with best practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to identify smartphone apps that provide safer sleep guidance and to assess their content, technical features, functionality, and quality. A secondary aim was to make recommendations on the improvements that existing and future apps can make to provide safer sleep guidance. METHODS: In January 2026, we searched the UK Google Play Store and Apple App Store for safer sleep guidance apps for parents and caregivers of newborns and infants (babies aged ≤12 months). Information regarding content, technical features, and functional features was extracted and summarized descriptively. Each app was evaluated by 2 raters using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics functionality score. Adherence to best practice sleep guidance was assessed using bespoke criteria. Interrater reliability was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1345 apps were identified, with 12 meeting the inclusion criteria. All were free to download, with 42% (5/12) containing in-app purchases. Only 17% (2/12) were affiliated with a professional health, medical, clinical, or government body. All 12 apps contained some information regarding safer sleep practices, although this was addressed and named differently (eg, calling it cot death, sudden infant death syndrome, or safe sleep). Of the 9 criteria relating to safer sleep best practice guidance, the apps mentioned an average of 6.75 (SD 1.71; range 3-9) criteria. Some promoted unsafe sleep practices (ie, around swaddling and cosleeping). The apps included an average of 5.4 of the 11 IMS functionality criteria (SD 2.5; range 2-9). The mean MARS score was 3.7 out of 5 (SD 0.43; range 2.92-4.13), and most (11/12, 92%) had a minimum acceptability score of 3 or above. Two had been formally trialed or tested. Although the language used was considered accessible (easy to understand), none of the apps allowed the language to be changed (beyond English), and very few (3/12, 25%) enabled users to change to night/dark mode, which would be considered essential when using these apps at night. CONCLUSIONS: Several apps about safer baby sleep exist. Few discuss safer sleep guidance comprehensively or raise awareness about sudden infant death syndrome and its links with unsafe sleep. All the reviewed apps met the minimum acceptability criteria for quality; however, not many were formally trialed or tested. More long-term research should be conducted on the effectiveness of safer sleep apps on adherence to safer sleep guidance. We recommend that apps relating to infant and baby safety in general include information on realistic safer sleep practices that are informed by best practice guidelines and take a risk minimization approach.
11 July 2026
Read appraisal →