Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Developing the multidisciplinary and multispecialty workforce and the systems needed to sustain high-quality care from diagnosis through long-term survivorship
With the growing population of individuals living with and beyond cancer-who often have a variety of complex health needs across their lifetimes-coordinated multidisciplinary, multispecialty expert care is needed to ensure comprehensive survivorship cancer care beginning at diagnosis. Guided by the July 2023 US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine workshop, we describe the evidence and propose steps to (1) identify and promote clinician competencies through education and training; (2) improve communication and care coordination, including leveraging the electronic health record and digital health innovations; (3) examine health system interventions and financial strategies to facilitate multidisciplinary, multispecialty survivorship care; and (4) identify policy, payment, and advocacy challenges and opportunities to achieve equitable, accessible, high-quality care. Although the recommendations are centered on the United States, their applicability to other countries should also be explored.
1 June 2026
Read appraisal →Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Cancer patients' experiences of "time toxicity": a qualitative meta-synthesis
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and synthesize qualitative studies on cancer patients' experiences of time toxicity, providing evidence to inform policy making. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, and other databases for qualitative studies on cancer patients' experiences of time toxicity, from database inception to November 2025. Included studies were appraised using the 2016 edition of the JBI quality appraisal criteria for qualitative research from the Joanna Briggs Institute (Australia). Results were synthesized using an aggregation approach for meta-synthesis. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. Forty-one themes were extracted, which were grouped into 11 categories and further consolidated into 4 synthesized findings: (1) multidimensional sources of time toxicity; (2) negative impacts of time toxicity; (3) coping strategies adopted to address time toxicity; and (4) positive experiences from investing time in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Time toxicity has multidimensional effects on cancer patients' daily rhythms, psychological states, and social roles, and requires coordinated attention from healthcare professionals, society, and policy makers. Future efforts should build systemic support through integrating healthcare resources, optimizing service processes, and strengthening social support to reduce patients' time toxicity.
30 May 2026
Read appraisal →