Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 3 appraisals
International journal of nursing education scholarship
Effect of concept mapping on critical thinking skills in nursing students: a systematic review with meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Critical thinking (CT) among nursing students is crucial for delivering high-quality nursing care to patients. Concept mapping (CM) is one of the evidence-based pedagogies that helps to improve CT in individuals. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of concept mapping on CT abilities, academic achievement, and clinical skills in nursing students. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify published articles on the effect of CM on CT in nursing students, written in English and published from 2011 to 2024. The articles were sourced from SCOPUS, Web of Science (WoS), ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. To ensure a comprehensive and relevant search, the following MeSH terms were used: "Effectiveness" OR "Impact," AND "Concept Mapping," AND "CT," AND "Nursing Student," AND "RCT" OR "Randomized Controlled Trials" OR "Quasi-Experimental." This study used the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB) tool and Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) for outcome measurement, with results analyzed using RevMan Web. RESULTS: This study analyzed 14 RCTs and quasi-experimental studies involving 1,747 participants (E=870, C=877). The meta-analysis found that concept mapping enhanced nursing students' CT skills (MD=4.86, 95 % CI [2.16 to 7.56], p=0.0004), academic achievements (MD=3.38, 95 % CI [0.76 to 5.99], p=0.01), and performance in clinical practice (MD=5.94, 95 % CI [3.22 to 8.65], p<0.0001) when compared to routine instructional methods. CONCLUSIONS: CM provides valuable insights into enhancing CT and clinical skills in nursing students, eventually preparing them to become excellent nursing professionals in the healthcare system.
26 July 2026
Read appraisal →JMIR medical education
Youth-Elder Co-Learning Model in Psychiatric Long-Term Care Education: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Communication and Empathy Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Taiwan is projected to become a "super-aged" society by 2025, leading to an increasing demand for community psychiatric long-term care (LTC). This demographic shift necessitates frontline professionals equipped with specialized communication skills and deep empathy. However, traditional didactic teaching often fails to adequately prepare students for the complex emotional and practical challenges of real-world psychiatric caregiving. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the innovative youth-elder co-learning instructional model, which uniquely integrates micro-movie discussions and an intergenerational empathy board game, on adult learners' professional knowledge, communication competence, empathic development, and overall learning satisfaction. METHODS: A mixed methods, single-group, pre-post design was used. The educational intervention was implemented within an 18-week elective community psychiatric LTC course. Participants included 38 adult learners and continuing education students (aged 19-64 years). Notably, the majority of the cohort (n=29, 76.3%) had no prior practical experience in LTC. Quantitative data were collected using self-assessed and peer-evaluated scales for professional knowledge, communication competence, and empathy at pre-, mid-, and post-course time points, alongside an end-of-semester course student feedback survey. Qualitative data were systematically gathered through structured reflective journals and analyzed using a rigorous 6-phase thematic analysis framework. RESULTS: Students reported high course satisfaction rates, ranging from 92.4% to 95.3%. Quantitative analysis revealed a notable divergence: there were significant improvements in peer-evaluated outcomes (P<.001) and self-assessed communication competence (P=.004), but there was more conservative, statistically nonsignificant growth in self-assessed scores for professional knowledge (P=.14) and empathy (P=.09). This discrepancy likely reflects adult learners' heightened awareness of professional complexity and self-reflective humility. Furthermore, the qualitative thematic analysis uncovered the following three narrative shifts: (1) the dismantling of generational stereotypes through authentic, face-to-face interaction with real older adults; (2) an empathic awakening regarding the often-invisible burden of family caregivers, catalyzed by the micro-movies; and (3) the successful translation of theoretical nonviolent communication concepts into real-time clinical problem-solving during board game role-plays. CONCLUSIONS: The youth-elder co-learning model shows promise as an innovative, experiential pedagogical approach. By bridging theoretical frameworks with authentic intergenerational contact, the intervention supported students in translating general empathic concepts into actionable communication competencies. However, given the exploratory nature of this study and the absence of a control group, the quantitative findings must be interpreted cautiously. Future research using randomized controlled trial designs across multiple institutions is warranted to establish definitive causal impacts.
10 July 2026
Read appraisal →Language, speech, and hearing services in schools
Enhancing Clinical Practice Through Research: Tools for School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists
PURPOSE: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the school setting need to efficiently locate, evaluate, and utilize research evidence in their clinical practice. This tutorial provides resources focused on the foundational aspects of evidence-based practice (EBP) and its application for SLPs to implement research into clinical practice. METHOD: This tutorial (a) reviews study design and discusses clinical questions best suited to each; (b) provides key tips for extracting information from main sections of research articles; (c) discusses the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) as a clinical and research tool, including actionable steps and examples for using AI in EBP; and (d) provides detailed strategies to increase interaction with research beyond reading articles. RESULTS: School-based SLPs can utilize the information and strategies provided to increase their confidence in evaluating research literature, applying information, and incorporating resources from research articles into their clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This tutorial equips school-based SLPs with actionable steps and concrete tools to increase ease and efficiency of applying research evidence into clinical practice. It provides guidance on different study designs, practical strategies to review research articles, and a case study demonstrating these strategies as well as discusses the potential use of AI to support clinicians in generating clinical questions and the steps of the EBP process. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31652170.
4 July 2026
Read appraisal →