Research Appraisals
Evidence-based critical appraisals of the latest medical research, systematically evaluated using Oxford CEBM methodology.
Showing 2 appraisals
Computers in biology and medicine
AI unleashed: A meta-analysis transforming radiological insights in diagnosing abdominal infections
INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based imaging modalities are next-generation diagnostic devices for abdominal infections that promise to provide enhanced diagnostic speed and accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis critically analyze the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted imaging modalities, including for appendicitis, pneumoperitoneum, and cholecystitis, to present a balanced estimate of their clinical utility. METHODS: A systematic literature search was undertaken in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to search for studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based imaging modalities for abdominal infections. Eleven studies were included based on the inclusion criteria, and data were pooled for analysis. Diagnostic performance was measured by estimating sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were done to investigate the effect of infection type on diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: AI-assisted imaging demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.824-0.944) and specificity of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.784-0.922) for diagnosing abdominal infections. Subgroup analysis revealed that AI-aided computed tomography (CT) exhibited a sensitivity of 0.902 (95% CI: 0.850-0.948), while ultrasound (US) showed a sensitivity of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.792-0.922). The highest AUCs were observed for pneumoperitoneum (0.985) and appendicitis (0.947), underscoring AI's robust diagnostic capabilities across multiple pathologies. CONCLUSION: AI-imaging modalities significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy for abdominal infections, particularly for appendicitis and pneumoperitoneum. This meta-analysis underscores AI's clinical potential, though future research should prioritize multicenter studies to validate AI models' generalizability and ensure consistent performance across diverse healthcare settings.
17 May 2026
Read appraisal →European heart journal
Deep learning electrocardiogram model for risk stratification of coronary revascularization need in the emergency department
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Identification of patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring coronary revascularization can be challenging due to inconclusive electrocardiogram (ECG) findings or biomarker results. A deep learning model to detect ECG patterns associated with revascularization likelihood was developed, aiming to guide further assessment and reduce diagnostic uncertainty. METHODS: A convolutional neural network model was trained on 144 691 ED visits from a US cohort (60 ± 19 years; 53% female; 0.6% revascularization), tested on a separate test cohort (n = 35 995), and benchmarked against clinician ECG interpretation and cardiac troponin T (TnT). External validation was performed for the outcomes revascularization and Type 1 myocardial infarction (MI) on 18 673 ED visits from Europe (55 ± 21 years; 49% female; 1.5% revascularization; 1% Type 1 MI). Primary performance metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: In the test cohort, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.91), outperforming clinician ECG interpretation (AUROC 0.65, 95% CI 0.54-0.76) and conventional cardiac TnT (AUROC 0.71). In the external validation cohort, ECG model AUROC was 0.81 (95% CI 0.81-0.82) for revascularization, and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.85) for Type 1 MI, compared with 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.83) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.92) for clinician interpretation, and 0.85 and 0.87 for high-sensitivity (hs)-TnT, respectively. The ECG model had higher specificity but lower sensitivity compared with high-sensitivity-troponin T. CONCLUSIONS: The model was able to detect revascularization and Type 1 MI with competitive performance, suggesting a potential role to complement current clinical assessment.
16 May 2026
Read appraisal →