Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Zanidatamab with and without Tislelizumab in HER2-Positive Gastroesophageal Cancer

The New England journal of medicineShitara, Kohei, Elimova, Elena, Liu, Tianshu et al.28 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

75CEBM
Evidence: StrongRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with previously untreated, centrally confirmed HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
I — InterventionZanidatamab plus tislelizumab plus chemotherapy OR zanidatamab plus chemotherapy
C — ComparatorTrastuzumab plus chemotherapy (standard of care)
O — OutcomesPrimary: progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary: safety profile including grade 3+ adverse events

Bottom Line

This phase 3 trial demonstrates that zanidatamab, a bispecific HER2-targeted antibody, significantly improves progression-free survival compared to standard trastuzumab-based therapy in HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal cancer. The combination with tislelizumab also showed superior overall survival. While the open-label design introduces bias risk, the magnitude of benefit (4+ month PFS gain, 7+ month OS gain) appears clinically meaningful. However, increased grade 3+ toxicity (83% vs 75%) and notably higher rates of severe diarrhoea (25% vs 13%) require careful patient selection and monitoring. The results support zanidatamab as a potential new standard of care, though cost-effectiveness and long-term safety data will be crucial for implementation decisions. Australian clinicians should await TGA approval and PBS consideration while preparing for potential changes to HER2-positive gastroesophageal cancer management protocols.

Evidence: Strong

Key Findings

  • P Value: P<0.001 for both PFS comparisons; P=0.004 for OS (zanidatamab-tislelizumab vs trastuzumab)

  • Effect Size: PFS hazard ratio 0.63-0.65; OS hazard ratio 0.72 for zanidatamab-tislelizumab vs trastuzumab

  • Primary Outcome: Progression-free survival: 12.4 months (both zanidatamab arms) vs 8.1 months (trastuzumab); Overall survival: 26.4 months (zanidatamab-tislelizumab) vs 19.2 months (trastuzumab)

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Median PFS benefit of 4.3 months; median OS benefit of 7.2 months with zanidatamab-tislelizumab combination

  • Confidence Interval: PFS: 95% CI 0.51-0.78 (zanidatamab-tislelizumab), 0.52-0.81 (zanidatamab alone); OS: 95% CI 0.57-0.90

Clinical Application

Requires HER2 testing infrastructure and access to bispecific antibody therapy; manageable toxicity profile with increased diarrhoea monitoring Would require TGA approval and PBS listing; aligns with current HER2 testing practices; may impact current trastuzumab-based first-line protocols pending cost-effectiveness evaluation Patients with previously untreated HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma suitable for systemic therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Zanidatamab, a dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted bispecific antibody, plus chemotherapy both with and without tislelizumab (anti-programmed death 1), showed encouraging efficacy and safety as first-line therapy in phase 2 studies involving patients with HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated, centrally confirmed HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to receive zanidatamab and tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, zanidatamab plus chemotherapy, or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. The two primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 25.9 months, progression-free survival was longer with zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy (median among 302 patients, 12.4 months) and zanidatamab-chemotherapy (median among 304 patients, 12.4 months) than with trastuzumab-chemotherapy (median among 308 patients, 8.1 months) (hazard ratio for progression or death with zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy, 0.63 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.51 to 0.78]; hazard ratio with zanidatamab-chemotherapy, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.81]; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Overall survival was longer with zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy than with trastuzumab-chemotherapy (median, 26.4 vs. 19.2 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.90; P = 0.004). At this interim analysis, overall survival did not differ significantly between zanidatamab-chemotherapy (median, 24.4 months) and trastuzumab-chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.01; P = 0.06). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 83.3% with zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy, 73.8% with zanidatamab-chemotherapy, and 74.5% with trastuzumab-chemotherapy; diarrhea was the most common such event, in 24.8%, 20.0%, and 12.9% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Zanidatamab plus chemotherapy, both with and without tislelizumab, led to longer progression-free survival than trastuzumab plus chemotherapy among patients with HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. At this interim analysis, overall survival was longer with zanidatamab-tislelizumab-chemotherapy than with trastuzumab-chemotherapy; further analyses are planned to assess zanidatamab-chemotherapy. Diarrhea was a common adverse event. (Funded by Jazz Pharmaceuticals and others; HERIZON-GEA-01 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05152147.).

References

  1. 1.Shitara, K., Elimova, E., Liu, T., Tabernero, J., Lee, K.-W., Schenker, M., Tebbutt, N. C., Ajani, J., Salimin, N., Ku, G., Kim, J. G., Diaz, I. A., Zhang, J., Pietrantonio, F., Bai, L.-Y., Le Sourd, S., Zhao, J., Hierro, C., Kiberu, A., Van Herpe, F., Bao, Y., Zhang, H., Yang, L., Li, V., Gartner, E. M., Chen, Y., Grim, J., Rha, S. Y., & Shen, L. (2026). Zanidatamab with and without tislelizumab in HER2-positive gastroesophageal cancer. *New England Journal of Medicine*. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2517729
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service