Wrist-Ankle Acupuncture on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis in High-Risk Female Patients: A Pragmatic, Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | High-risk female patients aged 18-60 years (ASA I-II) undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with documented motion sickness or previous PONV |
| I — Intervention | Wrist-ankle acupuncture (WAA) with sterile needles at four standardised acupoints, 30-minute retention postoperatively |
| C — Comparator | Sham acupuncture control |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: 24-hour PONV incidence using Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching (R-INVR). Secondary: PONV severity scores, patient satisfaction, antiemetic use, adverse events |
Bottom Line
This single-centre RCT demonstrates that wrist-ankle acupuncture significantly reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk female patients, with a number needed to treat of approximately 3.5. The intervention reduced 24-hour PONV incidence from 71% to 42% compared to sham acupuncture, with sustained benefits and improved patient satisfaction. However, methodological limitations including unclear randomisation procedures, lack of baseline characteristics reporting, and single-centre design limit confidence in the findings. While the results are promising for this non-pharmacological approach, larger multicentre trials with robust methodology are needed before routine clinical implementation. The intervention appears safe with no reported adverse events, making it potentially suitable as an adjunct to standard antiemetic prophylaxis in appropriate clinical settings with trained practitioners.
Key Findings
P Value: p = 0.002
Effect Size: 28.8% absolute risk reduction
Primary Outcome: 24-hour PONV incidence: 42.4% (WAA) vs 71.2% (sham)
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Number needed to treat: approximately 3.5 patients
Confidence Interval: RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.42-0.82)
Clinical Application
Requires trained acupuncturists and institutional support. May be challenging in centres without established acupuncture services Could complement existing PONV prevention strategies. Not currently covered by PBS but may be available in some public hospitals with integrative medicine programs. Would require training and credentialing of practitioners High-risk female surgical patients with previous PONV or motion sickness undergoing elective procedures
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) affects up to 80% of high-risk patients, compromising Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) outcomes and prolonging hospitalization. This randomized controlled trial evaluated wrist-ankle acupuncture (WAA) efficacy for PONV prevention in high-risk female surgical patients. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial enrolled female patients (aged 18-60 years, ASA I-II) scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with documented motion sickness or previous PONV. Participants received either WAA (sterile needles at four standardized acupoints, 30-minute retention) or sham acupuncture postoperatively. The primary outcome was 24-h PONV incidence using the Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching (R-INVR). RESULTS: Among 132 patients (median age 41 years), WAA significantly reduced 24-h PONV incidence versus sham (42.4% vs. 71.2%; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.82; p = 0.002). Median R-INVR scores were lower with WAA [0 (0-5) vs. 8 (0-11); p < 0.001]. WAA patients reported significantly reduced nausea/vomiting at 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h (all p ≤ 0.006) and higher satisfaction scores (p < 0.001). Antiemetic use was comparable (9.1% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.299). No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: WAA significantly reduced PONV incidence and severity with sustained effects and improved satisfaction, offering a promising non-pharmacological prevention strategy.
References
- 1.Yu, L., Wang, X., Mei, L., Song, J., Song, W., Xue, H., Wu, S., Wang, J., Li, L., & Chen, W. (2026). Wrist-ankle acupuncture on postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in high-risk female patients: A pragmatic, randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled trial. Journal of Investigative Surgery, Article 2652778. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2026.2652778
Related Research
Scandinavian journal of pain
Multimodal deep learning fusion for automatic pain detection in cancer patients
26 July 2026
BMJ open
Shared decision making in pain care: a systematic review study protocol of decision aids
11 July 2026
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Engineering biomarker representations of vital signs data enhances deep learning mortality prediction
3 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service