Who is screened for perinatal mental health? findings from an academic health system in California.
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Over 6000 patients who delivered singleton infants within one academic healthcare system in California between 2021 and 2023 |
| I — Intervention | Perinatal mental health screening using Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) |
| C — Comparator | Patient characteristics (race/ethnicity, insurance, parity, language preference, timing of care initiation, delivery type, gestational age) |
| O — Outcomes | Completion of mental health screening during pregnancy and postpartum period (within 12 weeks of delivery) |
Bottom Line
This cross-sectional study of over 6000 women in a California academic health system reveals significant gaps in mandated perinatal mental health screening, with only 67% screened during pregnancy and 56% postpartum. Concerning disparities emerged: White women, those with private insurance, and women with fewer prenatal visits were less likely to be screened. The study highlights that legal mandates alone are insufficient to ensure universal screening. For Australian clinicians, these findings underscore the importance of systematic approaches to perinatal mental health screening, particularly given Medicare's support for perinatal mental health services. The identified disparities suggest that screening protocols should be embedded in routine care pathways rather than relying on opportunistic screening. Healthcare systems should monitor screening completion rates and develop targeted strategies for populations less likely to receive screening. While the single-centre design limits generalisability, the large sample size and objective EMR data provide robust evidence of implementation challenges that likely exist across healthcare systems globally.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported in abstract
Effect Size: Lower odds of screening for White patients, multiparous women (pregnancy); White patients, privately insured, vaginal delivery, term births (postpartum)
Primary Outcome: 67% completed mental health screening during pregnancy, 56% completed postpartum screening
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Screening completion rates: 67% pregnancy, 56% postpartum
Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract
Clinical Application
Findings highlight implementation challenges even with legal mandates; requires system-level interventions to address identified disparities Relevant to Australian perinatal mental health initiatives; differs from California's legal mandate but applicable to RACGP guidelines recommending routine screening and Medicare-funded perinatal mental health items Pregnant and postpartum women receiving care in healthcare systems with mandated mental health screening
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify sociodemographic characteristics, prenatal healthcare utilization, and health factors associated with completed mental health screenings during pregnancy and postpartum, respectively. METHODS: We examined electronic medical records (EMR) data on documented perinatal mental health screenings from over 6000 patients who delivered singleton infants within one academic healthcare system in California between 2021 and 2023. Dependent variables included having at least one Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score documented in the EMR during (1) pregnancy and (2) postpartum, among those who completed postpartum care within 12 weeks of delivery. We used univariate frequencies to determine rates of completed screenings and logistic regression models to identify patient characteristics associated with completed screenings in each time period. RESULTS: Overall, 67% of patients completed screenings in pregnancy and 56% completed screenings in postpartum. In pregnancy, patients who were White, multiparous, did not prefer English, began prenatal care in the third trimester, and completed 10 or fewer prenatal care visits each had lower odds of completed screenings than their counterparts. In postpartum, patients who were White, privately insured, had vaginal deliveries, and had term births (at least 37 weeks of gestation) each had lower odds of completed screenings than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Although California law requires perinatal mental health screening in pregnancy and postpartum , the identified inequities in screening suggest additional efforts are needed to ensure all perinatal patients are screened for mental health in accordance with the law. These efforts should be tailored to the populations least likely to be screened in order to achieve universal perinatal mental health screening.
Related Research
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ChatGPT in urogynecology: Comparing large language model responses to human experts
3 Aug 2026
Ultrasound in medicine & biology
A Systematic Review: The Application of Attention Mechanisms in Medical Ultrasound Image Processing
2 Aug 2026
Preventing chronic disease
Reducing Rates of Cesarean Delivery in Rural US Communities: A Systematic Review of Interventions and Approaches to Care
31 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service