Research Appraisalother

Use of Health and Welfare Technology in Palliative Care: State-of-the-Art Review

J Med Internet ResZander, Viktoria, Holm, Maja, Mazaheri, Monir et al.1 Mar 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

35CEBM
Evidence: Weakother

PICO Framework

P — PopulationAdult patients receiving palliative care and their families/caregivers
I — InterventionHealth and welfare technologies (HWT) including telemedicine, digital health tools, and assistive technologies
C — ComparatorUsual palliative care without technology enhancement
O — OutcomesQuality of life, symptom management, care access and continuity, patient-family-provider relationships, emergency visits

Bottom Line

This narrative review of 94 studies suggests health and welfare technologies may complement traditional palliative care by improving access, continuity, and symptom management, particularly for home-based and rural patients. However, the review lacks systematic methodology, quality assessment, and quantitative synthesis typical of high-quality evidence reviews. The authors appropriately acknowledge the 'profound lack of evidence' and recommend caution in technology implementation. While the findings are conceptually promising, the methodological limitations prevent strong clinical recommendations. Clinicians should view this as preliminary evidence requiring validation through rigorous systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials before widespread adoption. The emphasis on careful patient selection and integration challenges reflects the complex nature of technology use in end-of-life care.

Evidence: Weak

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not applicable - no statistical testing

  • Effect Size: Not quantified - qualitative synthesis only

  • Primary Outcome: Health and welfare technology shows potential to improve palliative care delivery

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculated - insufficient quantitative data

  • Confidence Interval: Not applicable - no quantitative analysis

Clinical Application

Variable - depends on technology literacy, infrastructure, and healthcare system integration Relevant to Australian rural and remote care challenges; aligns with TGA digital health initiatives and RACGP position on telehealth in palliative care Adult patients receiving palliative care, particularly those in home and rural settings

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As more individuals live longer with complex conditions, the need for effective palliative care (PC) grows. It has been stated that access to PC should be integrated early and delivered in a timely manner to patients with life-threatening illnesses. Health and welfare technologies (HWTs) offer tools to enhance care delivery, particularly in home and rural settings. Although there is a profound lack of evidence regarding the impact when used in PC, it is necessary to critically assess the current state of knowledge regarding impacts and consequences of technologies, ensuring that their integration considers broader implications for patients, caregivers, and health care systems in PC. OBJECTIVE: This review explores health and welfare technology used in PC, aiming to inform practice and improve care quality. METHODS: This state-of-the-art review included empirical studies describing the use of HWT in PC for adult patients. We used a thematic synthesis approach to compare studies and provide a synthesis of the key points. RESULTS: Based on the inclusion criteria, 94 studies were included. PC is both a clinical specialty and an overall approach to care that focuses on improving quality of life and relieving suffering for patients and families facing serious illness, based on needs and not prognosis. HWT shows potential to increase access and continuity of care, for symptom management to support patients to remain at home and prevent frequent emergency visits. It can have the potential to build and remain relationships between patients, their families, and the health care team, as well as for interprofessional collaboration and support. However, there are challenges to overcome that might affect the quality of care when using technology. CONCLUSIONS: HWT shows potential as a complement to usual PC. Our findings point toward the importance of caution in choosing when to use HWT in PC, and for which patients.

References

  1. 1.Zander, V., Holm, M., Mazaheri, M., Gustafsson, C., Landerdahl Stridsberg, S., & Hedman, R. (2026). Use of Health and Welfare Technology in Palliative Care: State-of-the-Art Review. *J Med Internet Res*. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.036
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service