Use of administrative data for evaluating trends in medically-attended Lyme disease, Manitoba, Canada, 2010-2021
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Residents of Manitoba, Canada (>95% coverage in administrative database), 2010-2021 |
| I — Intervention | Claims-based identification using diagnostic codes, antibiotic dispensations, and laboratory results |
| C — Comparator | Public health surveillance-reported Lyme disease cases |
| O — Outcomes | Incidence of medically-attended Lyme disease per 100,000 population per year, stratified by sex and health region |
Bottom Line
This Manitoba study suggests substantial underreporting of Lyme disease in public health surveillance, with administrative data revealing 5-11 times higher incidence rates. While the large population-based database provides valuable insights into healthcare utilisation patterns, the lack of clinical validation limits confidence in true disease burden estimates. The findings highlight potential gaps in surveillance systems but require cautious interpretation due to possible diagnostic misclassification. For Australian clinicians, this reinforces the importance of robust surveillance systems for emerging vector-borne diseases, though direct extrapolation is limited given different tick ecology and Lyme disease controversy in Australia.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported
Effect Size: 5.1-11.0 fold higher incidence compared to surveillance data
Primary Outcome: Claims-based Lyme disease incidence: 8.4-28.5 per 100,000 population annually
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Sensitivity analysis not performed for case definition validation
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Methodology could be adapted to other jurisdictions with comprehensive administrative health databases Limited direct applicability due to different tick species and Lyme disease epidemiology in Australia; however, methodology relevant for other vector-borne disease surveillance using Medicare/PBS data Healthcare systems using administrative data for disease surveillance, particularly in tick-endemic regions
Abstract
While Lyme disease (LD) is the most common tick-borne disease reported to public health surveillance in North America and is increasingly recognized as a public health threat in Canada, it's incidence may be underreported. Our study aims to estimate medically-attended LD incidence in Manitoba, Canada, using administrative health data. We identified medically-attended LD cases in Manitoba from 2010 - 2021 in a claims database (Manitoba Population Research Data Repository), which contains the health records of >95% of the residents of Manitoba, using diagnostic codes, antibiotic dispensations, and laboratory results. The incidence of claims-based LD cases ranged from 8.4 to 28.5 per 100,000 population per year, 5.1 to 11.0 times higher than the incidence of surveillance-reported LD cases. The incidence of claims-based LD cases was particularly higher than the incidence of surveillance-reported LD cases in females and health regions with a low surveillance-reported incidence. Our study suggests that medically attended LD is more common than reported in surveillance. Further study is required to identify barriers to reporting. Interventions are needed to reduce the substantial burden of LD in Manitoba.
References
- 1.Major, M., Horton, S., Nightingale, N., Halsby, K., Angulo, F. J., Stark, J., Yu, H., Loeb, M., Wang, I., Nair, S., Neish, C. S., Thomas, D., McDonald, C., Torres-Florez, S., Grajales, A. G., & Willis, S. J. (2024). Use of administrative data for evaluating trends in medically-attended Lyme disease, Manitoba, Canada, 2010-2021. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342260
Related Research
Journal of medical Internet research
Advancing Human-Centered AI in Clinical Decision Support: Sociocognitive Human-in-the-Loop Study in HIV Care
2 Aug 2026
JBJS reviews
One-Stage or Two-Stage Revision for Infected Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
30 July 2026
Signal transduction and targeted therapy
Mucosal immunity and vaccine development
27 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service