Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Training Clinicians in Private Practice in Family-Based Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Online Approaches

Journal of medical Internet researchLock, James, Le Grange, Daniel, Matheson, Brittany et al.25 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

75CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — Population123 licensed mental health therapists in private practice in the United States with no previous family-based treatment (FBT) training
I — InterventionInteractive e-training on-demand program (ET-FBT) with focus on key FBT interventions plus optional group clinical case consultation
C — ComparatorWebinar training lecture series plus optional group clinical case consultation
O — OutcomesPrimary: FBT fidelity, therapist self-efficacy, working alliance. Secondary: patient early response rates (2.4kg weight gain at session 4), training completion rates, acceptability

Bottom Line

This RCT demonstrates that online training in family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa is feasible and effective for private practice clinicians. Both webinar and interactive e-training formats significantly improved therapist competency and patient outcomes, with early response rates doubling to match those seen in research trials. The high completion rate (95%) and clinically meaningful improvements suggest online training could help bridge the evidence-practice gap in eating disorder treatment. However, ongoing clinical consultation had lower uptake, indicating implementation challenges that need addressing. For Australian clinicians, this supports the viability of online professional development in evidence-based eating disorder treatments, potentially informing training programs through professional colleges and health services.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Significant improvements reported but specific p-values not provided

  • Effect Size: Not reported in abstract

  • Primary Outcome: Both training formats significantly improved FBT fidelity, therapist self-efficacy, and working alliance

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Early response rates doubled from 16% to 34% post-training

  • Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract

Clinical Application

High feasibility demonstrated with 95% completion rate for online training. Lower feasibility for ongoing consultation (38% completion) Highly relevant to Australian practice given similar private practice models. Could inform RANZCP training initiatives and complement existing eating disorder treatment guidelines Mental health clinicians treating adolescents with anorexia nervosa, particularly those in private practice seeking evidence-based training

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a critical need to disseminate efficacious psychosocial treatments for mental disorders because there is a significant gap between evidence-based treatment (EBT) approaches and usual clinical practice. To address this gap, cost-effective, efficient, and scalable methods of training mental health clinicians in EBT are needed. One example of the need to improve dissemination and implementation of psychosocial treatments is for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN), a serious mental disorder with an incidence rate of about 1% that can become life-threatening. Based on outcomes from a series of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), an EBT for adolescents with AN is family-based treatment (FBT); however, few therapists are trained in the approach. Some studies suggest that online training is feasible for training clinicians treating eating disorders, including pilot data related to FBT specifically, but RCTs examining different training formats for FBT to improve fidelity and patient outcomes are needed. OBJECTIVE: This study compared 2 different formats for delivering online training in FBT to therapists treating adolescents with AN and planned to assess the feasibility of the 2 training formats, as well as to examine whether either approach was superior in improving fidelity to FBT or patient outcomes. METHODS: Participants were 123 mental health therapists licensed in the United States in private practice with no previous FBT training. Therapists were randomized to either (1) a webinar training lecture series or (2) an interactive e-training on-demand program (ET-FBT) with an additional focus on key FBT interventions. Both groups were offered up to 12 one-hour group-based clinical case consultation (CCC) sessions posttraining. We examined the feasibility and acceptability of the online training programs and posttraining outcomes in fidelity to key components of FBT, self-efficacy, and working alliance. We explored rates of patient early response (weight gain of 2.4 kg at session 4) in adolescent patients with AN treated after FBT training during CCC. RESULTS: Both online trainings had a high completion rate of 95% (117/123), with CCC completion at 38% (47/123). Both programs showed significant improvements within randomized groups in therapists' fidelity, self-efficacy, and working alliance. Working alliance improved significantly more in the ET-FBT group, but there were no other significant differences between training groups. Early response rates doubled posttraining and CCC (16%-34%), regardless of randomized training format, a rate that is similar to that achieved by therapists in RCTs examining FBT treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to deliver online training in FBT to clinicians in private practice in 2 different formats, and both trainings led to significant improvements in fidelity, self-efficacy, working alliance, and patient outcomes. Future studies should address challenges in patient recruitment for posttraining CCC and refine CCC implementation to maximize training effects and efficiency.

References

  1. 1.Lock, J., Le Grange, D., Matheson, B., Kim, B., Bohon, C., & Jo, B. (2026). Training Clinicians in Private Practice in Family-Based Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Online Approaches. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 28(5). https://doi.org/10.2196/89999
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service