Time-related changes in bacterial air contamination of sterile covered items in operating rooms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Sterile items covered with protective covers in operating room environments |
| I — Intervention | Extended time exposure in operating room air |
| C — Comparator | Baseline or shorter time exposure periods |
| O — Outcomes | Bacterial contamination measured as colony forming units (CFU) at multiple time points |
Bottom Line
This systematic review provides reassuring evidence that sterile covers effectively protect surgical instruments from bacterial contamination over time in operating room environments. With time explaining less than 10% of contamination variance and no statistically significant increase in colony forming units over extended periods, the findings support advance preparation of covered sterile items without compromising patient safety. This evidence reinforces current perioperative protocols and enables more efficient OR workflow planning. While the protective effect of sterile covers is confirmed, the limited number of studies and mixed results from excluded timelines suggest continued vigilance and adherence to established sterile technique protocols remain essential. The findings are particularly relevant for busy surgical departments seeking to optimise case turnover while maintaining infection control standards.
Key Findings
P Value: p = 0.176 for CFU count; p = 0.108 for mean CFU values
Effect Size: Time explains only 7-8.5% of CFU variation (R² = 0.070-0.085)
Primary Outcome: Colony forming units (CFU) over time for covered sterile items
Nnt Or Sensitivity: No statistically significant linear association between time and bacterial contamination when sterile covers used
Confidence Interval: CFU count: -1.319 < β < 4.863; Mean CFU: 0.191 < β < 0.420
Clinical Application
Highly feasible - supports current practice of advance preparation of covered sterile items Aligns with ACORN standards for perioperative nursing and TGA guidelines for sterile medical devices. Supports efficient OR utilisation consistent with Australian healthcare efficiency initiatives Operating room staff, sterile processing departments, infection control teams
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is still only limited evidence regarding how bacterial air contamination of sterile items changes over time in the operating room, even when protected by sterile covers. This review aimed to synthesize the available data to inform safe handling and preparation of sterile equipment. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for controlled studies that assessed time-related bacterial contamination of covered sterile items in operating rooms and that reported the outcome as colony forming units (CFU) measured at two or more time points, generating distinct timelines. Six databases were searched from inception to 1 September 2025: Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, and Web of Science. A meta-analysis was performed using linear regression with CFU as the dependent variable and time (minutes) as the independent variable. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251018280). RESULTS: Five timelines from four studies evaluating CFU counts yielded an R2 of 0.085, indicating that time explained 8.5% of CFU variation. Similarly, analysis of eight timelines from four studies assessing mean CFU values produced an R2 of 0.070, attributing 7% of variation to time. Neither analysis demonstrated a statistically significant linear association between time and CFU count (p = 0.176, CI: -1.319 < β < 4.863) or mean CFU values (p = 0.108, CI: 0.191 < β < 0.420) when sterile covers were used. Three additional timelines excluded from the meta-analysis showed mixed results: two indicated a positive association, while one showed no relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Time has only a modest impact on bacterial contamination of sterile items when protective covers are used, with minimal increases in CFU over different waiting periods. Clinically, this confirms that properly covered sterile items can be prepared in advance without compromising microbial safety, thus supporting efficient operating room organization and workflow. These findings reinforce the effectiveness of sterile covers as a key measure to reduce the risk of surgical site infections and ensure the safe handling of sterile equipment. Although covered storage appears safe, minimizing unnecessary waiting time, even with coverage, is good clinical practice.
References
- 1.Wistrand, C., Westerdahl, E., & Sundqvist, A. S. (2026). Time-related changes in bacterial air contamination of sterile covered items in operating rooms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.78B5.0780835
Related Research
Journal of clinical microbiology
Prediction of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae by MALDI-TOF MS, ensemble learning, and spectral peak annotation
14 May 2026
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Effectiveness of Mobile Health Interventions in Pediatric Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
26 Apr 2026
Nanoscale
Bifunctional PVDF/MXene membranes with high piezoelectric sensitivity and near infrared photothermal antibacterial efficacy toward wearable human activity monitoring
17 Apr 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service