Therapeutic effects of selumetinib on diffuse neurofibroma and optic pathway glioma in neurofibromatosis type 1.

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: P < 0.001 for comparison between NF1-DN and NF1-PN response rates

• Effect Size: Median volume reduction -11.9% for NF1-DN (range -55.4% to +36.3%)

• Primary Outcome: Partial response rate: 36% (9/25) for NF1-DN, 33% (1/3) for NF1-OPG

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: Confirmed partial response rate: 24% (6/25) for NF1-DN

• Confidence Interval: Not provided

Clinical Application

Requires specialised NF1 centres with expertise in MEK inhibitor management and long-term monitoring capabilities Selumetinib approved by TGA for plexiform neurofibromas; PBS listing may require special access for off-label use in diffuse neurofibromas and optic pathway gliomas Paediatric and adult patients with NF1-associated diffuse neurofibromas or optic pathway gliomas who have failed conventional management

Abstract

PURPOSE: Selumetinib is approved for the treatment of inoperable plexiform neurofibromas (PN) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). However, its efficacy in treating NF1-associated diffuse neurofibromas (NF1-DN) or optic pathway gliomas (NF1-OPG) remains unclear. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of selumetinib in these subgroups. METHODS: This was a sub-analysis of a Korean phase II open-label trial focusing on non-target treatment effects on NF1-DN and NF1-OPG. A total of 88 pediatric and adult patients with NF1-PN (59 children and 29 adults) in this trial had been treated for at least 2 years (~ 26 cycles, 28-day cycle) with oral selumetinib (20 or 25 mg/m², or 50 mg/dose every 12 h). Tumor volume, quality of life (QoL), and visual acuity were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 88 included patients, NF1-DN was diagnosed in 25 (28%), and NF1-OPG in 3 (3%). All NF1-DN patients exhibited disfigurement, two experienced pain, and a partial response (PR; ≥20% tumor reduction at a single time) was achieved in 9 of these cases (36%). The median time to PR was 6 cycles (range, 6-12), and the median time to best response was 18 cycles (range, 6-26), with a median volume change of - 11.9% (range, - 55.4% to + 36.3%). Confirmed PR (cPR; PR sustained for > 6 cycles) was observed in 6 NF1-DN patients (24%), stable disease (SD) was observed in 9 of these patients (36%), and progressive disease (PD) in 10 cases (40%). In a paired comparison, cPR was significantly lower for NF1-DN than for NF1-PN (24% vs. 88%, P < 0.001), and the median best volume reduction was also smaller (- 11.9% vs. -42.1%, P < 0.001). For the 3 NF1-OPG patients, visual impairment was present in all cases at baseline. One patient achieved PR at cycle 12 (- 36.1% from baseline) and complete response (CR) at cycle 26 but the visual acuity did not improve in this case. SD was maintained in the other two patients. Within these subgroups, QoL improved in 16 patients (57%) by cycle 26. No serious adverse events or treatment discontinuations were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Selumetinib shows therapeutic potential against NF1-DN, although with a lower response than that observed against NF1-PN. The NF1-OPG findings herein for this drug were exploratory only because of the small number of cases, but they may provide an additional clinical context for evaluating the broader effects of selumetinib across NF1-associated lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: KCT0003700, cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/19,080, first submission March 4, 2019; first patient enrolled May 14, 2019.