Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

The Veterans Affairs' Whole Health Approach for Chronic Pain Management: The wHOPE Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMASeal, Karen H, Morasco, Benjamin J, Martin, Aaron M et al.26 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

55CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — PopulationUS Veterans with chronic pain receiving VA primary care (n=764, mean age 60.5 years, 66.5% male)
I — InterventionVA Whole Health team intervention (interdisciplinary team with primary physician/NP, nonpharmacological/integrative pain clinician, and coach)
C — ComparatorCognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (group sessions) and usual care
O — OutcomesPrimary: Brief Pain Inventory interference (BPI-I) subscale score at 12 months; Secondary: adverse events including suicidal ideation

Bottom Line

This large VA trial demonstrates that a whole health team approach produces statistically significant but clinically modest improvements in pain interference compared to cognitive behavioral therapy and usual care in veterans with chronic pain. While the intervention showed superior outcomes, the effect sizes (0.58-0.77 points) fell below the minimal clinically important difference of 1.0 point on the Brief Pain Inventory interference scale. The 12-month intervention required substantial resources including interdisciplinary teams with physicians, integrative medicine specialists, and health coaches. Adverse events, including suicidal ideation, occurred at similar rates across all groups (13-16%). For Australian clinicians, these findings suggest that while multidisciplinary chronic pain approaches may provide incremental benefits, the clinical significance remains questionable given the resource investment required. The results support existing RACGP guidelines for multidisciplinary pain management but highlight the need for cost-effectiveness evaluation before widespread implementation.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Whole Health vs CBT: P=0.02; Whole Health vs Usual Care: P=0.002; CBT vs Usual Care: P=0.46

  • Effect Size: Whole Health vs CBT: -0.58 points; Whole Health vs Usual Care: -0.77 points

  • Primary Outcome: BPI-I score improvement: Whole Health -1.7 points, CBT -0.9 points, Usual Care -0.7 points

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: Effect sizes below MCID of 1.0 point, suggesting limited clinical benefit despite statistical significance

  • Confidence Interval: Whole Health vs CBT: 97% CI -1.11 to -0.05; Whole Health vs Usual Care: 99% CI -1.40 to -0.15

Clinical Application

Requires significant healthcare system investment in interdisciplinary teams including physicians, integrative medicine specialists, and health coaches Relevant to Australian integrated pain services and multidisciplinary chronic disease management programs, though resource requirements may limit implementation outside major centres. Aligns with RACGP chronic pain management guidelines emphasising multidisciplinary approaches Veterans and potentially other patients with chronic pain in integrated healthcare systems with multidisciplinary resources

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Whole Health approach was congressionally mandated in 2016 for patients with chronic pain receiving care in VA hospitals, but no randomized clinical trials have tested its benefits. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a whole health team intervention in VA patients with chronic pain compared with cognitive behavioral therapy and with usual care, and to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy compared with usual care in reducing long-term pain interference. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial involving 6 VA health systems in the US enrolled participants between September 18, 2020, and January 19, 2024. Final follow-up occurred on January 27, 2025. Analyses took place between April 1, 2025, and February 3, 2026. Participants were patients with chronic pain receiving VA primary care. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with chronic pain were randomized (11:11:2) to receive a whole health team intervention (n = 343), cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain delivered in group sessions (n = 339), or usual care (n = 82) for 12 months. The whole health team included a primary physician or nurse practitioner, a second clinician providing nonpharmacological or integrative pain care, and a coach. The team provided interdisciplinary, individualized care consistent with the VA Whole Health model to attain personal health goals aligned with patients' personal values and life goals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Brief Pain Inventory interference (BPI-I) subscale score (range, 0-10 points; higher scores indicate worse interference from pain; minimal clinically important difference, 1.0) at 12 months. RESULTS: Of 764 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 60.5 [12.3] years; 66.5% were men), 632 (82.7%) completed 12-month follow-up. At 12 months, the whole health group had significantly improved pain interference scores (from 6.6 to 4.9) compared with the cognitive behavioral therapy (from 6.4 to 5.5) (mean difference, -0.58 [97% CI, -1.11 to -0.05]; P = .02) and usual care (from 6.4 to 5.7) (mean difference, -0.77 [99% CI, -1.40 to -0.15]; P = .002) groups. At 12 months, cognitive behavioral therapy did not improve pain interference scores significantly more than usual care (mean difference, -0.19 [99% CI, -0.89 to 0.50]; P = .46). The most common adverse event was suicidal ideation, which occurred in 15.9% of patients in the cognitive behavioral therapy group, 13.7% in the whole health team group, and 13.4% in the usual care group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results support use of the whole health team approach to attain a statistically significant but small improvement in pain interference in VA patients with chronic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04330365.

References

  1. 1.Seal, K. H., Morasco, B. J., Martin, A. M., Reddy, K. P., Van Iseghem, T. M., Bolton, R. E., Bokhour, B. G., Murphy, J., Denneson, L. M., Esserman, D., Buta, E., Purcell, N., Bertenthal, D., Painter, J. T., Abadjian, L. R., Moore, L. C., Chan, A. C., McCamish, N., Maguen, S., Neylan, T. C., Gibson, C. J., & Becker, W. C. (2026). The Veterans Affairs' Whole Health Approach for Chronic Pain Management: The wHOPE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08376-0
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service