The safety and efficacy of perioperative nefopam for analgesia in spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adult patients undergoing spine surgery |
| I — Intervention | Perioperative nefopam administration |
| C — Comparator | Standard care or placebo |
| O — Outcomes | 24-hour morphine consumption, pain scores (incisional and neuropathic), length of stay, adverse events |
Bottom Line
This systematic review of seven RCTs (n=553) found that perioperative nefopam did not significantly reduce 24-hour morphine consumption, pain scores, or hospital length of stay in spine surgery patients. The evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate using GRADE criteria. Importantly, most included studies used nefopam doses below the median effective dose, which limits the validity of conclusions about its true efficacy and safety profile. While nefopam showed no increase in adverse events compared to controls, the current evidence does not support its routine use as an opioid-sparing agent in spine surgery. Future research should focus on dose-response relationships and optimal administration protocols before definitive recommendations can be made.
Key Findings
P Value: Not significant
Effect Size: MD -1.47 mg
Primary Outcome: 24-hour morphine consumption
Nnt Or Sensitivity: No clinically meaningful reduction in opioid consumption
Confidence Interval: 95% CI: -3.86 to 0.92 mg
Clinical Application
Limited by suboptimal dosing in most studies and lack of clear benefit over standard care Nefopam available on PBS for specific indications; results suggest limited evidence for routine use in spine surgery without dose optimisation studies Adult patients undergoing spine surgery requiring multimodal analgesia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Moderate-to-severe pain is common after spine surgery. While opioids remain standard analgesia, their adverse effects have prompted opioid-sparing strategies. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of nefopam, a non-opioid and non-NSAID, as adjuvant perioperative analgesia in spine surgery. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to May 9, 2025. RevMan V5.4 was used to analyse mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes. The GRADE framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Seven randomised controlled trials (n = 553) were included. Nefopam did not reduce 24-hour morphine use (MD -1.47 mg; 95% CI: -3.86 to 0.92 mg; GRADE moderate), 24-hour incisional pain (SMD, -0.01; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.20; GRADE moderate), 48-hour incisional pain (SMD, -0.24; 95% CI -0.50 to 0.02; GRADE low), 24-hour neuropathic pain (SMD, -0.19; 95% CI -0.49 to 0.10; GRADE low), 72-hour neuropathic pain (SMD, -0.33; 95% CI -1.02 to 0.36; GRADE very low), or length of stay (MD, 0.08days; 95% CI -0.73 to 0.88days; GRADE Low). There were no significant differences in drug-related adverse effects (sedation (RR 1.30), nausea/vomiting (RR 1.03), dizziness (RR 1.14), and urinary retention (RR 2.36)), (GRADE: very low to low). CONCLUSION: Perioperative nefopam did not reduce acute morphine use, pain scores, hospital stay, or drug-related adverse events in spine surgery, though most studies used doses below the median effective dose, limiting conclusions on its efficacy and safety.
References
- 1.Osunronbi, T., Okechukwu, H., Adeyeye, E., Abbou, Z., Mtemeri, J., & Karmi, Z. (2026). The safety and efficacy of perioperative nefopam for analgesia in spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Neurosurgical Review. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200506000-00022
Related Research
Clinical spine surgery
An Introduction to Machine Learning for the Practicing Spine Surgeon
2 Aug 2026
Brain and behavior
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1 Aug 2026
Neurosurgical review
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting postoperative hydrocephalus in 1,073 posterior fossa tumor patients
31 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service