The Real-Time Support Role of Augmented Reality Technology in Shared Decision-Making in Neurosurgery Under the SEGUE Framework: Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Snapshot

Key Findings

• P Value: P=.01 for primary outcome, P<.001 for communication satisfaction

• Effect Size: Not reported in abstract

• Primary Outcome: Objective understanding significantly higher with AR vs physical model (P=.01)

• Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable from available data

• Confidence Interval: Not reported in abstract

Clinical Application

Requires AR technology infrastructure and training. May be challenging in resource-limited settings initially. Relevant to Australian neurosurgical practice. Technology costs may require evaluation for PBS consideration. Aligns with RACGP shared decision-making principles and TGA medical device regulations would apply. Neurosurgical patients and their legally authorized representatives requiring preoperative risk communication

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative risk communication is essential for shared decision-making (SDM) in neurosurgery; however, conveying complex neuroanatomy and surgical risks using traditional verbal explanations can limit understanding and contribute to dissatisfaction and medicolegal disputes. Augmented reality (AR) may provide patient-specific, interactive 3D visualization to support these conversations. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates whether AR-assisted preoperative risk communication improves objective understanding and other SDM-related outcomes, compared with communication supported by a conventional physical anatomical model within a standardized SEGUE-informed protocol. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 62 neurosurgery communication recipients (patients when capable; otherwise, a legally authorized representative [LAR]). Patients were stratified by planned surgical approach (frontal, parietal, and occipital) and, within each stratum, were randomized into an experimental AR group and a control physical-model group. The primary outcome was postsession objective understanding, assessed by a multiple-choice knowledge questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were subjective understanding, communication satisfaction, pre-to-post anxiety changes, communication duration, and neurosurgeons' communication skills from video recordings. RESULTS: Of the 67 individuals screened, 62 communication recipients were enrolled and completed all assessments (patients, n=30; LARs, n=32; AR, n=32; and control, n=30). Objective understanding was higher with AR than with the physical model in the prespecified pooled comparison (P=.01). Communication satisfaction was also higher with AR (P<.001). There were no clear between-group differences in subjective understanding (P=.41), anxiety changes (ΔState-Trait Anxiety Inventory [ΔSTAI] Y-1, P=.37; ΔSTAI Y-2, P=.84), in-session face-to-face communication duration (excluding any presession AR technical preparation time; P=.73), or SEGUE scores (P=.60). Exploratory stratified analyses suggested larger comprehension gains with AR in the parietal and occipital approach strata. CONCLUSIONS: In a standardized preoperative SDM conversation, an integrated visualization-support package combining AR, patient-specific modeling, and interactivity improved neurosurgical decision makers' objective understanding and satisfaction without prolonging in-session, face-to-face communication duration. Larger multicenter trials with longer-term outcomes are warranted to confirm effectiveness and to evaluate implementation and cost considerations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN11483487; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11483487.

References

1. 1.Yuan, Z., Shi, Z., & Wang, Z. (2026). The Real-Time Support Role of Augmented Reality Technology in Shared Decision-Making in Neurosurgery Under the SEGUE Framework: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 28(4), e87198. https://doi.org/10.2196/87198