The impact of cultural concordance between health professionals and patients: a narrative review
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Patients receiving healthcare from health professionals |
| I — Intervention | Cultural/ethnic concordance between patients and health professionals |
| C — Comparator | Cultural/ethnic discordance or non-concordant patient-provider relationships |
| O — Outcomes | Communication quality, trust, satisfaction, healthcare utilisation, medication adherence, preventative care uptake, clinical decision-making, and clinical outcomes |
Bottom Line
This narrative review examines cultural concordance between patients and healthcare providers, finding mixed but generally positive effects on patient experience, communication, and some clinical outcomes. While the evidence suggests cultural concordance improves trust, satisfaction, and healthcare engagement, the impact on hard clinical endpoints remains inconsistent. The review's methodology falls short of systematic review standards, lacking rigorous search strategies and quality assessment. Most evidence derives from US studies, limiting direct applicability to Australian practice. Despite methodological limitations, the findings support initiatives to increase healthcare workforce diversity and enhance cultural competency training. For Australian clinicians, this reinforces the importance of culturally responsive care while highlighting the need for local research to guide evidence-based workforce and training policies.
Key Findings
P Value: Not applicable - narrative review
Effect Size: Not quantified - narrative synthesis only
Primary Outcome: Cultural concordance associated with improved communication quality, trust, satisfaction and perceived respect
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Variable effects across different patient populations and healthcare settings
Confidence Interval: Not provided
Clinical Application
Requires long-term workforce development strategies and cultural competency training programs Highly relevant to Australian healthcare given similar multicultural population and Indigenous health disparities. Aligns with RACGP cultural competency standards and could inform medical workforce planning initiatives All patients in healthcare settings, particularly those from ethnic minority backgrounds
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this article is to summarise international evidence on the impacts of cultural/ethnic concordance between patients and health professionals and to discuss the implications for New Zealand. METHOD: Database searches were conducted from August to September 2025 using Scopus, Embase and PubMed, using key terms related to health outcomes and cultural/ethnic concordance. RESULTS: A total of 25 relevant systematic reviews, meta-analyses and research studies were included for analysis. Overall, evidence is predominately from the United States of America and findings are variable. Cultural concordance is associated with improved communication quality, trust, satisfaction and perceived respect. Concordance is also associated with improved healthcare utilisation, medication adherence and uptake of preventative interventions. Some studies found concordance was associated with differences in clinical decision-making. Impact on clinical outcomes is mixed, with some studies finding concordance has a positive impact on caesarean section rates, diabetes management, surgical outcomes and addiction treatment, while others found no impact. CONCLUSION: Cultural concordance between patients and their health professionals matters, with evidence of impact on patient experience, communication quality, engagement and adherence, clinical decision-making and some clinical outcomes. Findings are inconsistent: the strength of association and groups which see the greatest benefit vary between studies. To reduce health inequities, we need to increase the diversity of the workforce and train all health professionals to provide non-racist, equitable care.
References
- 1.Loring, B., & Reid, P. (2026). The impact of cultural concordance between health professionals and patients: a narrative review. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 139(1634). https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7278
Related Research
The Journal of rheumatology
Examining the Role of Wearables in Inflammatory Arthritis Care: A Narrative Literature Review
3 Aug 2026
Journal of medical Internet research
Advancing Human-Centered AI in Clinical Decision Support: Sociocognitive Human-in-the-Loop Study in HIV Care
2 Aug 2026
Journal of psychiatric research
Systematic review of machine learning and deep learning models for EEG-based detection of depression.
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service