Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

The Effects of Conservative Fluid Management and Active Deresuscitation on Markers of Tissue Perfusion, Kidney Injury, and Vascular Injury in Critically Ill Adults: A Secondary Analysis of the Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation-2 (RADAR-2) Trial

Critical care explorationsMcMullan, Ross R, McGrath, Christopher, Cody, Neil et al.1 Apr 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

60CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — PopulationCritically ill adults enrolled in the RADAR-2 trial requiring fluid management in ICU settings
I — InterventionConservative fluid management with active deresuscitation
C — ComparatorUsual care fluid management
O — OutcomesTissue perfusion markers (lactate), acute kidney injury markers (AKIRisk score, urinary cystatin-C), vascular injury markers (hyaluronan, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-2), and 28-day mortality

Bottom Line

This secondary analysis of the RADAR-2 trial found that conservative fluid management with active deresuscitation did not adversely affect tissue perfusion or kidney function markers compared to usual care in critically ill adults. However, the anticipated reduction in vascular injury markers was not observed. The study was underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences, limiting definitive conclusions. Importantly, elevated baseline levels of vascular injury biomarkers (hyaluronan, syndecan-1) and NT-proBNP were strongly associated with 28-day mortality, suggesting potential prognostic utility. While conservative fluid strategies appear safe from a biomarker perspective, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the modest sample size and wide confidence intervals. The results support the safety of conservative approaches but do not provide strong evidence for superiority over usual care.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: No significant p-values reported for primary biomarker comparisons

  • Effect Size: No significant differences observed between conservative fluid management and usual care groups

  • Primary Outcome: No statistically detectable between-group differences in tissue perfusion (lactate), kidney injury markers, or vascular injury biomarkers

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: High baseline hyaluronan (aOR 5.75, 95% CI 1.94-17.02), syndecan-1 (aOR 8.82, 95% CI 2.67-29.15), and NT-proBNP >2500 pg/mL (aOR 21.48, 95% CI 3.57-129.41) associated with 28-day mortality

  • Confidence Interval: Bootstrapped CIs calculated but specific values not provided for primary comparisons

Clinical Application

Conservative fluid management strategies are feasible in Australian ICU settings with appropriate monitoring capabilities Relevant to Australian intensive care practice guidelines and CICM training curricula. Biomarker testing may have PBS implications for routine monitoring Critically ill adults in Australian ICUs requiring fluid management decisions, particularly those with established resuscitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Test the hypothesis that conservative fluid management with active deresuscitation would not adversely affect tissue perfusion or kidney injury and would be associated with reduced vascular injury compared with usual care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation-2 (RADAR-2) trial. SETTING: ICUs. PATIENTS OR SUBJECTS: Critically ill patients enrolled in the RADAR-2 trial. INTERVENTIONS: Conservative fluid management with active deresuscitation vs. usual care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measures of tissue hypoperfusion (whole blood lactate), acute kidney injury (AKIRisk score and urinary cystatin-C), and vascular injury (plasma hyaluronan, syndecan-1, and angiopoietin-2) were compared between groups. For each analyte, change from baseline was compared between groups and the median inter-group difference at each timepoint was estimated with bootstrapped CIs. Exploratory logistic regression examined associations between plasma biomarker levels (including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]), 28-day mortality, and treatment allocation. Whole blood lactate levels were similar between groups at all timepoints. Using change from baseline comparisons, no statistically detectable between-group differences were observed in AKIRisk scores or urinary cystatin-C levels. Plasma vascular injury biomarkers showed no statistically detectable between-group differences at any timepoint. High baseline hyaluronan (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.75; 95% CI, 1.94-17.02; p = 0.002), syndecan-1 (aOR, 8.82; 95% CI, 2.67-29.15; p < 0.001), and NT-proBNP greater than 2500 pg/mL (aOR, 21.48; 95% CI, 3.57-129.41; p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased 28-day mortality. There was no evidence of differential treatment response based on these biomarker levels. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative fluid management and active deresuscitation were not associated with worsening tissue perfusion or acute kidney injury. A reduction in vascular injury markers was not observed. Given the modest sample size and resultant imprecision, clinically important effects cannot be excluded.

References

  1. 1.McMullan, R. R., McGrath, C., Cody, N., Conlon, J., McCamley, G., Symington, E., Scannell, S., Raja, P., Rostron, A., Bannard-Smith, J., Szakmány, T., Trinder, J., Johnston, P., Marshall, J. C., O'Kane, C. M., Busby, J., McAuley, D. F., Boyle, A. J., & Silversides, J. A. (2026). The Effects of Conservative Fluid Management and Active Deresuscitation on Markers of Tissue Perfusion, Kidney Injury, and Vascular Injury in Critically Ill Adults: A Secondary Analysis of the Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation-2 (RADAR-2) Trial. Critical Care Explorations. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001404
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service