Research AppraisalRandomised Controlled Trial

Temporal modulation of antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: the TAILORED-CHIP randomized clinical trial

European heart journalKang, Do-Yoon, Wee, Seong-Bong, Ahn, Jung-Min et al.5 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

60CEBM
Evidence: ModerateRandomised Controlled Trial

PICO Framework

P — Population2018 high-risk patients with anatomical or clinical characteristics undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (mean age 64.0 years, 22.6% left main PCI, 19.5% complex bifurcation PCI, 84.1% diffuse long lesions, 93.7% multivessel PCI, 36.7% diabetes)
I — InterventionTailored antiplatelet strategy with early escalation (low-dose ticagrelor 60mg twice daily plus aspirin for <6 months) and late de-escalation (clopidogrel monotherapy >6 months)
C — ComparatorStandard dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin for 12 months)
O — OutcomesPrimary composite outcome: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, unplanned urgent revascularization, and clinically relevant bleeding (BARC Type 2, 3, or 5) at 12 months

Bottom Line

This large randomised trial of 2018 high-risk patients undergoing complex PCI found that a tailored antiplatelet strategy with early ticagrelor escalation followed by late clopidogrel de-escalation did not reduce net adverse events compared to standard dual antiplatelet therapy at 12 months. The tailored approach showed no significant difference in the primary composite endpoint (10.5% vs 8.8%, HR 1.19, P=0.21) but was associated with significantly increased clinically relevant bleeding (7.2% vs 4.8%, absolute difference 2.45%). These findings suggest that the complex tailored approach offers no clinical advantage over standard DAPT in this high-risk population and may increase bleeding risk. For Australian clinicians managing complex PCI patients, these results support continuing with established dual antiplatelet therapy protocols rather than adopting this particular tailored strategy. The study reinforces the ongoing challenge of optimising antiplatelet therapy in high-risk interventional patients.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: P = 0.21

  • Effect Size: 10.5% (tailored) vs 8.8% (standard DAPT)

  • Primary Outcome: Composite of death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis, urgent revascularization, and clinically relevant bleeding at 12 months

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: No benefit demonstrated; Number Needed to Harm for bleeding: 41 patients (based on 2.45% absolute increase)

  • Confidence Interval: HR 1.19 (95% CI 0.90-1.58)

Clinical Application

Strategy requires careful timing of medication switches and patient compliance with complex regimen changes Relevant to Australian interventional cardiology practice; ticagrelor and clopidogrel both PBS-listed; aligns with current CSANZ guidelines for high-risk PCI patients High-risk patients undergoing complex PCI including left main, bifurcation lesions, diffuse disease, and multivessel intervention

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Limited data exist on optimal antiplatelet strategies for high-risk patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tailored antiplatelet treatment with temporal modulation of the intensity of platelet inhibition in patients undergoing complex high-risk PCI. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2018 patients with high-risk anatomical or clinical characteristics undergoing complex PCI to a tailored antiplatelet strategy with early escalation (low-dose ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily plus aspirin <6 months) and late de-escalation (clopidogrel monotherapy >6 months) or dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin for 12 months). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, unplanned urgent revascularization, and clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 2, 3, or 5) at 12 months. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.0 years, 22.6% had left main PCI, 19.5% had complex bifurcation PCI, 84.1% had diffuse long lesions, 93.7% had multivessel PCI, and 36.7% had medically treated diabetes. At 12 months, a primary outcome event occurred in 105 patients (10.5%) assigned to tailored antiplatelet therapy and in 89 patients (8.8%) assigned to dual antiplatelet therapy [hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-1.58; P = .21]. The incidence of major ischaemic events appeared to be similar in both groups. The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding at 12 months was 7.2% in the tailored-therapy group and 4.8% in the dual-therapy group (difference, 2.45% points; 95% CI, 0.37-4.53). CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk patients undergoing complex PCI, tailored antiplatelet strategy with early escalation and late de-escalation, as compared with dual antiplatelet therapy, did not decrease the incidence of primary net adverse events at 12 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03465644.

References

  1. 1.Kang, D. Y., Wee, S. B., Ahn, J. M., Park, H., Yun, S. C., Park, K. H., Kang, S. H., Suh, J., Bae, J. W., Park, S., Cho, J. H., Suh, J. W., Lee, B. K., Rha, S. W., Won, H., Jang, J. S., Cho, Y. R., Lee, C. H., Ahn, Y. K., Oh, J. H., Bae, J. S., Park, C. S., Lee, J. B., Choi, J., Lee, S. W., Her, S. H., Kwon, O., Park, S. J., & Park, D. W. (2026). Temporal modulation of antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: the TAILORED-CHIP randomized clinical trial. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf652
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service