Subjective and objective measures of sleep-related function from the Cardiovascular Endpoints For Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Twelfth Cranial Nerve Stimulation (CARDIOSA-12) trial : Sleep-related functional outcomes in CARDIOSA-12.
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | Adults with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea already optimized on hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy (n=60, subset n=43 for cognitive testing, mean age 65.7 years, BMI 29.7 kg/m², baseline AHI 34.2 events/h) |
| I — Intervention | Active hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy for 4 weeks |
| C — Comparator | Control (partially therapeutic) HGNS therapy for 4 weeks |
| O — Outcomes | Primary: Cognitive performance (psychomotor vigilance test, digit symbol substitution test); Secondary: Patient-reported outcomes (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Insomnia Severity Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, Snoring Visual Analog Scale) |
Bottom Line
This well-designed crossover trial in 60 patients with established HGNS therapy found that active versus partially therapeutic stimulation significantly improved subjective sleep-related outcomes but showed no meaningful differences in objective cognitive performance. While all patient-reported measures (sleepiness, insomnia, functional outcomes, snoring) improved with active therapy, cognitive testing revealed benefits only in a subset analysis. The study's strength lies in its rigorous crossover design and comprehensive outcome assessment, but its clinical applicability is limited to the narrow population already using HGNS devices. For Australian clinicians, these findings suggest that HGNS optimization primarily benefits subjective sleep quality rather than measurable cognitive function, which may inform patient counselling and treatment expectations in this specialized population.
Key Findings
P Value: p = 0.025 (DSST reaction time, per-protocol analysis)
Effect Size: DSST reaction time improvement: -153.6 ms (per-protocol analysis only)
Primary Outcome: No significant differences in cognitive performance measures (PVT, DSST) between active and control HGNS in intention-to-treat analysis
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Not calculable - continuous outcomes with mixed significance
Confidence Interval: 95% CI: -285.3 to -22.0 ms
Clinical Application
Limited to specialized sleep centers with HGNS capability and expertise in device programming HGNS therapy available through private healthcare in Australia; not currently PBS-subsidized. Limited to major metropolitan sleep centers with appropriate surgical expertise and device programming capabilities Patients with moderate-severe OSA already established on HGNS therapy considering optimization of stimulation parameters
Abstract
PURPOSE: The effect of therapeutic versus partially therapeutic levels of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy on cognitive measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was evaluated in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: In a 10-week, double-blind, randomized crossover therapy trial, subjects optimized on HGNS therapy underwent 4 weeks each of active and control (partially therapeutic) HGNS therapy. Cognitive measures (psychomotor vigilance test [PVT], digit symbol substitution test [DSST]) and sleep-related PROs were assessed after each 4-week treatment period. RESULTS: Sixty subjects were randomized and completed the primary study protocol, including PROs. A subset of randomized subjects (n = 43) underwent cognitive testing. This subset was, on average, older (65.7 ± 10.2 years), overweight/obese (body mass index [BMI] 29.7 ± 4.6 kg/m2), and had severe OSA at baseline (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 34.2 ± 15.0 events/h). There were no differences in cognitive performance measures between active and control (partially therapeutic) HGNS conditions in all subjects; in the per-protocol analysis, however, improvement in DSST reaction time with active HGNS was demonstrated (mean [95% CI] change on active therapy = - 153.6 [- 285.3, - 22.0] ms; p = 0.025). Significant improvements in all PROs (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Insomnia Severity Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and Snoring Visual Analog Scale) were observed in the active HGNS condition. CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary analysis of the CARDIOSA-12 randomized crossover trial of subjects using HGNS, subjective PROs, but not objective cognitive measures, were improved with active HGNS compared to control (partially therapeutic) HGNS therapy. These findings warrant additional investigation examining the relationship between subjective and objective neurocognitive outcomes in OSA. The effect of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS), a novel and promising therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), on neurocognitive deficits remains underexplored. This study evaluated whether HGNS therapy improves cognitive performance using the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), along with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to sleepiness, snoring, insomnia, and sleep-related function. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences in PVT or DSST outcomes were observed between active and control (partially therapeutic) HGNS therapy; however, in a subset of participants with ≥ 50% reduction in AHI with active HGNS, improvement in DSST reaction time was noted. All PROs significantly improved with active HGNS, suggesting benefits in subjective measures without substantial changes in objective cognitive measures.
References
- 1.Tangutur, A., Yu, P. K., Basner, M., Keenan, B. T., & Dedhia, R. C. (2026). Subjective and objective measures of sleep-related function from the Cardiovascular Endpoints For Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Twelfth Cranial Nerve Stimulation (CARDIOSA-12) trial: Sleep-related functional outcomes in CARDIOSA-12. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-020-02270-3
Related Research
Sleep medicine
Concordance of wearable device sleep metrics with patient-reported sleep quality: A systematic review
3 Aug 2026
Sleep medicine reviews
Machine and deep learning in REM sleep behavior disorder: a scoping review and analysis of reporting quality
3 Aug 2026
Sleep medicine reviews
Artificial intelligence in sleep medicine I: Diagnosis, treatment, care, and research
2 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service