Research AppraisalSystematic Review

Risk of cancer incidence and mortality in patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cancer metastasis reviewsLai, Chun Hei, Hefteh, Natalia, Kingsford, Sophie et al.11 May 2026DOI

Clinical Snapshot

65CEBM
Evidence: ModerateSystematic Review

PICO Framework

P — PopulationPatients with chronic pain (minimal or non-inflammatory features)
I — InterventionChronic pain exposure
C — ComparatorPatients without chronic pain or general population
O — OutcomesCancer incidence and cancer mortality

Bottom Line

This systematic review and meta-analysis found no overall association between chronic pain and cancer mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.04). While some site-specific analyses suggested potential associations with breast and prostate cancer incidence, the evidence quality was limited with only 6 of 23 studies rated as high quality. The authors appropriately highlight significant methodological challenges including reverse causation, confounding by opioid use, and healthcare utilisation bias. The limited search strategy and high heterogeneity further weaken confidence in the findings. For Australian clinicians, these results do not support enhanced cancer screening protocols based solely on chronic pain status, but emphasise the importance of addressing pain management without unfounded cancer concerns while remaining vigilant for potential underlying malignancy in new-onset or changing pain patterns.

Evidence: Moderate

Key Findings

  • P Value: Not significant

  • Effect Size: HR 1.00

  • Primary Outcome: Cancer mortality

  • Nnt Or Sensitivity: No clinically meaningful association demonstrated

  • Confidence Interval: 95% CI 0.97-1.04

Clinical Application

Results suggest no need for enhanced cancer screening based solely on chronic pain status Relevant to Australian chronic pain management guidelines and PBS opioid prescribing policies, particularly given concerns about opioid-related confounding Patients with chronic non-inflammatory pain conditions

Abstract

Evidence from experimental studies suggests that pain may influence cancer development. We conducted a systematic review (registration osf.io/ms437) of the epidemiological studies assessing whether chronic pain, with minimal or non-inflammatory features, increases the risk of cancer incidence or mortality. The search used Scopus and Web of Science up to 11/03/2025. Quality assessment used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study characteristics and outcomes were analysed using narrative synthesis, with random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression conducted where appropriate. A total of 23 studies (12 prospective, 11 retrospective) met the inclusion criteria, of which six were rated as high quality. The outcome data synthesis indicates a small increase in cancer mortality rate ratios, and a potential increase in a subset of organs. A total of three body site-specific analyses suggest that chronic pain may be associated with higher incidence for breast (SIR 2.12-4.8) and prostate (SIR 1.49-5.59) cancers, and with increased mortality for lung cancer (MRR 3.09, 95% CI 1.45-6.62). Ten studies were included for meta-analysis, including four studies rated as high quality. Meta-analysis of hazard ratios showed no association between cancer-related mortality and pain (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.04), with consistent estimates across pain subtypes in meta-regression. Our review and meta-analysis do not support an overall association between chronic pain and increased risk of cancer mortality or incidence and highlight multiple methodological and conceptual obstacles to exploring this relationship, including reverse causation and confounding factors such as pain and opioid use association. High-quality studies that rigorously address reverse causation and confounding are warranted.

References

  1. 1.Lai, C. H., Hefteh, N., Kingsford, S., La Caze, A., Sheikh, M., Shrestha, S., & Parat, M. O. (2026). Risk of cancer incidence and mortality in patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Metastasis Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.224
Share:XLinkedIn

This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service