Recurrent Resistance Mutations to Lirafugratinib Inform Treatment Sequencing in FGFR2-Driven Tumors
Clinical Snapshot
PICO Framework
| P — Population | 30 patients with FGFR2-driven cancers (60% intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 40% other tumor types), 73% FGFR inhibitor-naïve |
| I — Intervention | Lirafugratinib treatment in phase I/II ReFocus trial |
| C — Comparator | Comparison with futibatinib resistance patterns and sequential treatment outcomes |
| O — Outcomes | Primary and acquired resistance mechanisms, FGFR2 kinase domain mutations, treatment response to sequential therapy |
Bottom Line
This prospective molecular analysis of 30 patients with FGFR2-driven cancers demonstrates distinct resistance patterns to lirafugratinib, with 69% of acquired resistance cases showing specific mutations at M538/L618 residues. The study reveals complementary resistance profiles between lirafugratinib and futibatinib, supporting sequential treatment strategies. While the sample size is modest, the comprehensive molecular characterization and preclinical validation strengthen the findings. For Australian oncologists, this research provides valuable insights for treatment sequencing, though access to lirafugratinib remains limited. The identification of specific resistance mutations could guide precision medicine approaches in FGFR2-driven cancers, particularly intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Larger validation studies and cost-effectiveness analyses will be needed before widespread clinical implementation.
Key Findings
P Value: Not reported for primary endpoints
Effect Size: 69% (11/16) of acquired resistance cases showed M538/L618 mutations
Primary Outcome: FGFR2 kinase domain mutations at resistance
Nnt Or Sensitivity: Primary resistance mechanisms identified in 5/6 (83%) pretreatment samples
Confidence Interval: Not reported
Clinical Application
Requires access to comprehensive molecular profiling and specialized FGFR inhibitors Limited immediate applicability as lirafugratinib not yet TGA-approved; futibatinib available through Special Access Scheme. Molecular profiling capabilities exist in major cancer centres Patients with FGFR2-driven cancers, particularly intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Abstract
PURPOSE: The use of reversible fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR) inhibitors leads to the emergence of "undruggable" FGFR2 kinase domain mutations, hampering sequential treatment strategies. Lirafugratinib and futibatinib are irreversible FGFR inhibitors with the most promising clinical activity against FGFR2-driven tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We characterized resistance to lirafugratinib with circulating tumor DNA, tissue whole-exome sequencing, and bulk RNA sequencing in 30 patients with FGFR2-driven cancers, treated in the phase I/II ReFocus trial (NCT04526106) and enrolled in the UNLOCK program at Gustave Roussy. RESULTS: Among the 30 patients included, 18 (60%) had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 12 (40%) had other tumor types. Twenty-two patients (73%) were FGFR inhibitor-naïve. Among those experiencing primary resistance to lirafugratinib, we identified potential resistance mechanisms in five of six pretreatment samples. Patients with acquired lirafugratinib resistance manifested an unprecedented emergence of FGFR2 mutations in the M538 and/or L618 residues of the kinase domain, documented in 11 of 16 cases (69%). Compared with futibatinib resistance, FGFR2 molecular brake (N550) and gatekeeper (V565) mutations were rare. Leveraging the spectrum of FGFR2 kinase domain mutations at resistance to lirafugratinib and futibatinib, respectively, we identified the complementarity of the two irreversible inhibitors. On the basis of viability assays in FGFR2::BICC1-dependent Ba/F3 models and in vivo studies on patient-derived xenografts, we propose treatment sequences with the two agents. After lirafugratinib progression, three patients received futibatinib and experienced prolonged disease response. CONCLUSIONS: The complementary activity of lirafugratinib and futibatinib against FGFR2 kinase domain mutations supports their sequential use when precise resistance mutations are detected in patients.
References
- 1.Facchinetti, F., Hollebecque, A., Barbé, R., Jang, D. M., Alonso-De-Castro, B., Brayé, F., Bigot, L., Nobre, C., Da Silva, A., Méteau, M., Delavigne, M., Soares, M., Italiano, A., Rodriguez, J., Mosele, F., Beshiri, K., Ducreux, M., Boilève, A., Nikolaev, S., Alonso-Garcia, I., Vasseur, D., Smolenschi, C., Bourien, H., Cotteret, S., Samaniego, J., Bernard, E., Nicotra, C., Ngo-Camus, M., Nakazawa, S., Tselikas, L., Badoual, C., André, F., Eck, M. J., Olaussen, K. A., Loriot, Y., & Friboulet, L. (2026). Recurrent resistance mutations to lirafugratinib inform treatment sequencing in FGFR2-driven tumors. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-4390
Related Research
Cancer medicine
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1 Aug 2026
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.
1 Aug 2026
Journal of breast imaging
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
30 July 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service